At 10:28 PM 2/14/02 +0000, Jim Eisele wrote:
>Hide & seek comes to mind.
>
>In response to
>
><< Please tell me where
> science doesn't = Genesis One. >>
>
>Paul Seely writes
>
>It is not just Day 4 that does not fit. See
>http://www.asa3.org/ASA/topics/Bible-Science/PSCF6-97Seely.html#The Bible
>and
>Science
>
>Paul, I have read that. And you make some good points (I especially like
>the one about the fruit trees). And I guess that you just got yourself some
>publicity. But please step up to the plate, and stop hiding behind a
>previous paper. What's your biggest beef with the reconciliation between
>Genesis One and Science? Bring it on. Let's get it out in the open where
>everyone can look at it. If you dare. -Jim
Jim, are you someone who decided to come here to tweak noses and see what
kind of response you could get? Or are you a troll?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 15 2002 - 13:20:23 EST