Thanks david, for these.
Some other web-based tsunami references for Allen, yourself, and anyone else interested. Summary quotes also.
Bryant, T. and Price, D. 2001. The magnitude and frequency of tsunami along the South coast of New South Wales, Australia.
http://www.uow.edu.au/science/geosciences/research/tsun.htm
"Tsunami waves produce four general categories of depositional and erosional evidence that can be preserved in the geological record. Individual items
within these categories are geomorphic signatures that, singly or in combination with each other, uniquely define the impact of tsunami in the coastal
landscape. Depositional: sand laminae, sand with boulders, chaotic mixes, imbricate boulders, smear deposits, sand sheets, beach ridges, coastal
barriers, carseland. Erosional: cavitation marks, S-forms, whirlpools and plugs, canyons, cascades and falls, roche moutonnees, toobrush shaped
stacks, fluted headlands, keel-shaped ridges, truncated cliffs, raised platforms, ramps, headlands, eroded barrier remnants."
Goto, K., Tajika, E., Tada, R., Iturralde-Vinent, M., Kiyokawa, S., Oji, T., Nakano, Y., Delgado, D. Garcia, C., Reinaldo R., and Matsui, T. 2001 K/T
boundary sequence of the Peñalver Formation: the deep-sea tsunami deposit in northwestern Cuba. GSA Annual Meeting, November 5-8, 2001,
http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2001AM/finalprogram/abstract_26788.htm
"The Peñalver Formation in northwestern Cuba is one of the thickest (>180 m) K/T boundary deposits in the world. It is composed of a lower gravity flow
unit and an upper homogenite unit, the latter being interpreted as a deep-sea tsunami deposit (Kastens and Cita, 1981; Takayama et al., 2000).
According to our previous study at the type locality, the upper homogenite unit has homogeneous appearance, and neither erosional nor current
structures are observed (Takayama et al., 2000). However, our recent study revealed slight compositional oscillations characterized by variation in
serpentine lithic content within the upper homogenite unit, which is repeated >6 times. These oscillations are associated with variation in coarse
fraction content within insoluble residues and are interpreted as reflecting the repeating vertical remixing and/or lateral supply of the clastic
particles caused not by gravity flow but by tsunami repetitions, because there is no erosional and current structure. We have also found that the
Peñalver Formation shows lateral lithological variations, over >150 km. At Santa Isabel (60 km to the west of Havana) and Matanzas (90 km to the east
of Havana), the upper homogenite unit is much thinner compared with that of the type locality in Havana, and has erosional surface at its base. These
differences may reflect difference in the influence of tsunamis reflecting the difference in the depositional depth at each locality. In spite of these
lithological variations, grain composition and grain size in the upper homogenite unit are very similar throughout the studied localities. Thus, the
upper unit of the Peñalver Formation was probably formed by rapid sedimentation from widely expanded sediment suspended cloud caused by energetic
impact-induced tsunamis in the Caribbean basin."
Jacobs, S. 2001. “Fossil hash:” A late Pleistocene tsunami deposit at 2nd street, San Pedro, California. Cordilleran Section - 97th Annual Meeting, and
Pacific Section, American Association of Petroleum Geologists (April 9-11, 2001) http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2001CD/finalprogram/abstract_3359.htm
"Late Pleistocene “fossil hash,” mapped by Woodring et al. (1946) as Palos Verdes Sand, rests unconformably on the wave-cut bench. We analyzed the
sediments and fossils of the “fossil hash” bed, with particular emphasis on determining its mode of deposition. The “fossil hash” bed, approximately
1-2 feet thick, fills irregularities on the surface of the wave-cut bench and thins in a westerly direction. This bed is overlain by a relatively thin
orange sand with sparse foraminifers, which indicates a marine origin, and should probably be considered part of the Palos Verdes Sand. Nonmarine older
alluvial terrace deposits overlie the marine deposits. The “fossil hash” bed contains an admixture of littoral to outer neritic (0-200 m water depth),
including megafossils (0-27 m) and microfossils (0-200 m), with pelagic (Neogloboquadrina pachyderma) and benthic (miliolid, 0-20 m, bolivinid, 20-100
m, and cassidulinid, 100-200 m, foraminifer) forms. This megafossil assemblage includes small and large, whole and broken shells. The sediments include
sand and silt with some schist pebbles. The “fossil hash” bed exhibits a lack of sorting, grading, and stratification."
Satake K., 1994. Study of Recent Tsunamis Sheds Light on Earthquakes. Eos Vol. 75, No. 1, January 4, 1994, p. 3. http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/satake.html
contains useful references but no description of deposits.
Young, R. W., Bryant, E. A., and Price, D. M. 1995. The imprint of tsunami in Quaternary coastal sediments of Southeastern Australia. Bulgarian
Geophysical Journal, 1995, v. XXI, No4, 24-32. http://www.uow.edu.au/science/geosciences/research/bellambi.html
"TL and 14C dating has revealed anomalous chrono-stratigraphies at two sites on the coast of southern New South Wales, Australia where Pleistocene
sands have been driven onshore over Holocene estuarine deposits. Lack of solar bleaching of the TL component which occurs in normal swash zones, an
identical TL age obtained from pumice incorporated in the Pleistocene deposit, and boulders scattered through the sand are indicative of tsunami
impact. These observations prompt reassessment of the strictly uniformitarian models of barrier emplacement during the Holocene transgression both in
eastern Australia and elsewhere in the world where tsunami are a possibility."
Recognising tsunami deposits is not only inveresting and important for understanding sedimentary history, but vital for coastal risk assessment, hence
the recent interest. Allen, when discussing tsunami deposits, it is vital to distinguish between shore deposits, where sediments are transported
shoreward by the wave, and seaward deposits, where material is transported off shore by the backwash. It is also important to distinguish those
generated by earthquakes and those by impacts. I should note that the NSW south coast sites are becoming quite well known and are shown to first year
university students.
Jon
bivalve wrote:
> An abstract on identifying tsunami depsotis in the geological record can be found at
> http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2002NC/finalprogram/abstract_32671.htm
>
> Dr. David Campbell
> Old Seashells
> 46860 Hilton Dr #1113
> Lexington Park MD 20653 USA
> bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com
>
> That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droigate Spa
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 13 2002 - 15:48:26 EST