Re: Response to Why YEC posting

From: tikeda@sprintmail.com
Date: Fri Aug 24 2001 - 13:15:47 EDT

  • Next message: Vandergraaf, Chuck: "RE: Response to Why YEC posting"

    David Bowman writes:
    >Regarding Chuck's protest:
    >
    >>Yes, if half lives are not constant but were shorter in the past,
    >>it is conceivable that the 235/238U ratio would have been
    >>sufficiently high 6000 years ago, but this would fly in the face
    >>of physics. ...
    >
    >The possibility of "flying in the face of physics" is no deterrent
    >to the truly committed YEC.
    [...]

    See the spoof at:
    http://www.theonion.com/onion3631/christian_right_lobbies.html

    Funniest phrase:
    "I don't accept fundamental tenets of science and I vote"

    - Tim Ikeda (tikeda@sprintmail.com)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Mail2Web - Check your email from the web at
    http://www.mail2web.com/ .



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 24 2001 - 13:16:09 EDT