Re: Response to Why YEC posting

From: Dawsonzhu@aol.com
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 09:22:04 EDT

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"

Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Maybe in reply to: Allen Roy: "Response to Why YEC posting"
Next in thread: Allen Roy: "Re: Response to Why YEC posting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Roy Allen wrote:

> Whether it is one or one thousand, the issue remains the same.
>

If creationists could results with 0.1 percent error,
most scientist would be listening.

By Grace we proceed,
Wayne

Next message: george murphy: "Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Previous message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?"
Maybe in reply to: Allen Roy: "Response to Why YEC posting"
Next in thread: Allen Roy: "Re: Response to Why YEC posting"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 23 2001 - 09:22:16 EDT