Re: SP...blah, blah, blah

From: Michael Roberts (topper@robertschirk.u-net.com)
Date: Sat Aug 18 2001 - 13:58:20 EDT

  • Next message: Darryl Maddox: "Re: correction: SPTNCAWHS_eD"

    A dog does not need 4 legs. A male dog here has one back leg and it can
    successfully cock its leg . It uses the good one for cocking and has to
    stand on its 2 front legs with its rear in the air and the one rear leg in
    position as a dog's leg ought to be. And then it happily has a pee.

    Michael

    PS how do kangaroo's mate?
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Lucy Masters" <masters@cox-internet.com>
    To: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2001 6:45 PM
    Subject: SP...blah, blah, blah

    > Dear All:
    >
    > Well! I certainly do agree with Bob's last post regarding SPOG. And
    > that goes for this nonsense about 3 vs. 4 legs. Of course most mammals
    > have four legs, and of course that's related to natural selection. If
    > they only had 3 legs, they'd be falling down all the time. It's really
    > hard to reproduce when one is falling down all the time, so 4 legs are
    > perfectly necessary for natural selection. For Heaven's Sake! Lucy
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Aug 18 2001 - 17:05:30 EDT