Excellent
Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: <RDehaan237@aol.com>
To: <gmurphy@raex.com>; <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
Cc: <bandstra@ese.ogi.edu>; <asa@calvin.edu>; <burgytwo@juno.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Is Jonah to be taken literally?
>
> In a message dated 8/13/01 8:40:09 PM, gmurphy@raex.com writes:
>
> << I tried to make the point in a recent post that the primary reason for
> considering Jonah not to be an historical narrative is the literary
character
> of
> the book. It contains obvious exaggerations. >>
>
> Let me weigh into this discussion. The exaggerations are obvious. The
story
> is in the class of stories, such as, Irish tall tales. It is told in this
> form, I believe, to catch the attention of the people of Israel who were
> known not listen to a straight sermon. A good story can do more to
demolish
> an attitude than other didactic literary devices.
>
> It is not enough, however, to call it a parable or tall tale or myth. We
> need to ask about its purpose. Why was the story written, and why was it
> preserved? With the help of others I have come to believe that the book
was
> written to correct the unhealthy ethnocentricity of the Jewish people, who
> had wrapped themselves in the belief that God loved them alone to the
> exclusion of other nations. Here God tells his people that he is
concerned
> about even the wicked city of Nineveh.
>
> Moreover, it hints at the point made in Isaiah, that the Jews were to be a
> light to the Gentiles, and that they, like Jonah were running away from
that
> obligation.
>
> George Murphy pointed out to me that Jonah may be seen as a counterbalance
to
> the book of Nahum, which gloats over the destruction of Nineveh. In Jonah
we
> find God having a tender spot in his heart for even the cattle there. By
> picking the most extreme cases--the most wicked city and ignorant people
and
> lowly animals--the story makes the point that God's concern extends to all
> lesser cities and creatures as well.
>
> Why did Jesus refer to Jonah to confirm that he will rise again in three
days
> if Jonah was not a historical character? I suggest that Jonah was so well
> fixed in the collective consciousness of the Jews, with all the nuances of
> the story, that Jesus had to say no more. Just as we might say, "As honest
as
> Old Abe," and everyone would get the point, so Jesus' meaning was clear to
> everyone.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Bob
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 14 2001 - 09:19:02 EDT