*
[Hammond... to M.D. earlier]
Consider this simple heuristic explanation of how God is
related to the brain, since you are computer literate you
should appreciate this:
Brain=Computer model of
Hammond's SPOG
The Human Brain is like a computer,
running a program called Reality.
Any upgrade in the program is called
a law of Physics, but any upgrade in
the Computer is called an act of God.
This is quite true according to Hammond's discovery of the SPOG.
According to the Secular Trend, the human brain is growing all the
time, in spurts and jumps. Every time this happens, it is like
upgrading the computer with a faster processor and more memory...
it starts running faster and the world suddenly looks like it is
getting smaller and going slower. This is called a "miracle". On
the other hand, every once and awhile a discovery in science is
made, and a few more lines are added to the program, this is
called a "new law of reality (Physics)". As you can see,
there is a big difference between "God" which is the computer,
and "Science" which is the program. Nowhere in the program is
it written that the computer may change unexpectedly (the brain)
and make the speed of the program (reality) suddenly change without
any apparent cause. this then, is why physics does not know there
is a God.
This is the simple explanation of what "God" is. Of course it's
only an analogy, proving all this requires some serious heavy duty
science; and that is what Hammond's SPOG is all about... the
rigorous scientific proof.
And I've got some more bad news for you, not only is there a God...
"Creation Science" is (essentially) true also. And I'm
a graduate physicist. In the above model that I posted
to M.D. at his request, think of the program on the computer
as having discovered that the Universe is 15-billion years old.
But also think of the program as not knowing that the computer
running the program is only 6,000 years old (advent of the
Homo Sapiens Sapiens, modern man's, brain). This is the basis
of the argument between the Creationists who say the World is
only 6,000 years old, and the Evolutionists who say it is
15-billion years old. Fact of the matter is that they are BOTH
scientifically correct. This means that science has accepted
the scientific fact of the Evolutionists, but denies the scientific
fact of the Creationists... and the Creationists are getting ready
to go to court about it (Kansas City)... and guess what... they
are going to win. And I wouldn't be at all surprised if they end
up citing my scientific discovery as their "scientific defense".
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 18 2001 - 18:25:51 EDT