Re: Sin and Death

From: Kenneth Piers (Pier@calvin.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:18:44 EST

  • Next message: Dr. John Stahl: "Re: More than TE in ASA"

    I wrote:

    > And did sin enter the world by the volitional act or acts of
    >humans as told in Gen. 3? If so then at some time there must have been
    a
    >"sinless world" prior to this (these) act(s). If there were such a
    sinless
    >world, would it be wrong to speak of the existence of a "perfect
    >communion" between the Creator and His creation, protean though the
    >creation may have been at this stage, and "immature" though the humans
    may
    >have been? If it is wrong to speak of "original sin" in this way, then
    it
    >seems hard to understand any need for atonement by the sacrifice of
    Jesus.

    And Keith responded:

    I am far from a theologian, but one way of thinking about this that is
    helpful to me in my current thinking is to view Adam as innocent, not
    perfect or "sinless." Just as we see infants as innocent, and
    recognize
    that children grow and reach an ill-defined time of accountability,
    mankind
    perhaps was in an initial stage of innocense. God's initial
    self-revelation may have been to humans who lacked any awareness of
    God's
    expectations and of their own tendencies to disobedience. This, to
    me,
    makes sense of the symbol of the "Tree of Good and Evil." Adam and
    Eve's
    innocense was broken through disobedience. It was in disobedience
    that
    they became aware of what sin was. This interpretation also makes
    sense of
    the subsequent call to Cain to master his sin.

    All theologians are now free to shoot me down. :-)

    Now I respond:

    But it seems difficult to associate the state of the first humans as a
    state of innocence such as in an infant. In a state of innocence the
    individual can hardly be held accountable for his or her behavior. We
    certainly don't hold infants accountable or attach blame to them for
    their actions do we? Accountability surely must be associated with a
    voluntary and knowledgeable act of wrongdoing. If the first humans did
    not know they were doing wrong how could they be held accountable?
    I wonder if there are theologians on this list? I was very serious
    about my question regarding why Gen. 1-11 is included in the Scriptures?
    What is it that we may reliably believe and learn from these stories?
    kpiers



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:19:00 EST