Re: A NT doctrine of creation (was canon within the canon)

From: george murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:25:33 EST

  • Next message: gordon brown: "Re: A YEC apologetic (was "Antediluvian Period")"

    Jonathan Clarke wrote:
            ..........................................................

    > > 2) One significant feature of some NT writings is the eschatological
    > > orientation of creation. The emphasis is on what God will do with creation
    > > in the future rather than how God created it in the past. Ephesians 1 & 4
    > > and Col.1:15-20 are especially noteworthy in this regard. & this future of
    > > creation is Christ, "for whom" all things are created & "in whom" all things
    > > are to be gathered up.
    > > But we shouldn't move too quickly to speak of God's purpose as
    > > "salvation". Eph.1:10 says that God's plan for creation is to unite all
    > > things in Christ. That is God's purpose before sin and the need for
    > > salvation are considered. I think that the answer to old question of
    > > whether the Incarnation would have taken place if humanity had not sinned is
    > > "Yes."
    > > Related to this is the fact that what it means to be genuinely human
    > > is known from Christ, not Adam and Eve. In the first place, the only thing
    > > that the NT tells us about A&E is that they sinned! (& the OT doesn't tell
    > > us a lot more!) But we're also told nothing about being conformed to the
    > > image of A&E or "growing up" into their stature - as we are with Christ in
    > > Rom.8:29, Eph.4:15, &c.
    > > & in line with this, the use of Ps.8 in Heb.2 makes it clear that it
    > > is through & in Christ that humanity is given true dominion over creation.
    > > It is true that the NT does not have nearly the emphasis on care for
    > > creation, & especially for the land, that we have in the NT - e.g., Lev.25.
    > > But the fact that true dominion is possible only in Christ tells us a great
    > > deal about the _kind_ of dominion we are called to - one of care & service
    > > rather than simply exploitation.
    >
    > I agree. If Christ is head over all things and yet came to not be served but to
    > serve, this says something very interesting about human "dominion" of creation
    > in Genesis 1 and Psalm 8. In what way are we to serve creation?

            & to take this another step: If cosmic and biological evolution is (& I
    certainly think it is) part of the way in which God achieves the eschatological goal
    set out in Eph.1:10, then an adequate theological understanding of evolution will
    have to be christological.

    Shalom,

    George



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:22:40 EST