What you propose sounds very much like ad ignorantiam to this logician.
Dave
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 08:50:40 EST SHinrichs9@aol.com writes:
> The following article explains what I think is a Rational Methodology
> for
> Identifying Supernatural Intervention. I would appreciate a critic
> of the
> article so the ongoing process of determining the correct
> fundamentals of the
> design argument can be continued.
>
> If an response is made please email me at Shinrichs9@aol.com so I am
> aware.
>
> URL is http://members.aol.com/SHinrichs9/spntid.htm
>
> TABLE OF CONTENTS
> 1.INTRODUCTION
> 2.VIOLATION OF DETERMINISTIC AND INDETERMINISTIC NATURAL
> PRINCIPLES.
> 2.1 Violation of Deterministic Natural Principles
> 2.2 Violation of Indeterministic Natural Principles
> 2.2.1 Detachable Requirement
> 2.2.2 Conservative Probability Calculation
> 2.2.3 Convergence
> 2.2.4 Types of SS Criterion
> 2.2.5 Implausible Probability Range
> 2.3 Summary
> 3.IDENTIFICATION OF PURPOSE
> 4.RELEVANT FIELDS
> 4.1 Origins of Religions
> 4.1.1 Supernatural Inspiration & Credibility
> 4.1.2 Credibility of Natural Historical Setting
> 4.1.3 Credibility of Supernatural Claims
> 4.2 Origins of Biology
> 4.3 Origins of Human Thinking
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 28 2000 - 13:08:29 EST