Re: Rational Methodology for Evaluating Supernatural Claims

From: David F Siemens (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Tue Nov 28 2000 - 13:09:00 EST

  • Next message: george murphy: "Re: Rational Methodology for Evaluating Supernatural Claim"

    What you propose sounds very much like ad ignorantiam to this logician.
    Dave

    On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 08:50:40 EST SHinrichs9@aol.com writes:
    > The following article explains what I think is a Rational Methodology
    > for
    > Identifying Supernatural Intervention. I would appreciate a critic
    > of the
    > article so the ongoing process of determining the correct
    > fundamentals of the
    > design argument can be continued.
    >
    > If an response is made please email me at Shinrichs9@aol.com so I am
    > aware.
    >
    > URL is http://members.aol.com/SHinrichs9/spntid.htm
    >
    > TABLE OF CONTENTS
    > 1.INTRODUCTION
    > 2.VIOLATION OF DETERMINISTIC AND INDETERMINISTIC NATURAL
    > PRINCIPLES.
    > 2.1 Violation of Deterministic Natural Principles
    > 2.2 Violation of Indeterministic Natural Principles
    > 2.2.1 Detachable Requirement
    > 2.2.2 Conservative Probability Calculation
    > 2.2.3 Convergence
    > 2.2.4 Types of SS Criterion
    > 2.2.5 Implausible Probability Range
    > 2.3 Summary
    > 3.IDENTIFICATION OF PURPOSE
    > 4.RELEVANT FIELDS
    > 4.1 Origins of Religions
    > 4.1.1 Supernatural Inspiration & Credibility
    > 4.1.2 Credibility of Natural Historical Setting
    > 4.1.3 Credibility of Supernatural Claims
    > 4.2 Origins of Biology
    > 4.3 Origins of Human Thinking
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 28 2000 - 13:08:29 EST