RE: A comparison of early 1800 apologetics with modern apologetics.

From: glenn morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:05:46 EST

  • Next message: Vernon Jenkins: "Re: Numerology"

    > There has been a change from this position. Most modern flood geologists
    > interpret Ps 104 as a reference to the Flood, not the creation as
    > here; and
    > the subject of Ps 104:8 as the land rising and falling, not the waters
    > as here. Penn's interpretation is the historical and contextual
    > interpretation. The modern creation science interpretation is ad
    > hoc. As I
    > titled my paper (Sept, 99 Perspectives) dealing with the modern view:
    > "Creation Science takes Psalm 104:6-9 out of Context". So, you
    > see, Glenn,
    > flood geolgists can change. (-:

    Wow, shot me down quickly. :-) Thanks for pointing out this change. I don't have my books over here to be able to check you out on this. Wish I could.

    glenn

    see http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
    for lots of creation/evolution information

    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 29 2000 - 12:05:15 EST