RE: ID

From: glenn morton (glenn.morton@btinternet.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:21:48 EDT

  • Next message: Bert Massie: "Re: ID"

    Moorad wrote:>
    > My conception of religion is man seeking God; whereas the
    > Christian faith it
    > is God seeking man. Accordingly, the ID movement can never lead to Christ
    > but to a heuristic "proof" of the existence of God. Moorad

    Not only that, ID claims not to care whether the designer is God, Allah,
    Aliens, or your next door neighbor.

            “Behe’s argument does not entail (as in logically compel) a theological
    conclusion because it is consistent with other explanations. For instance,
    perhaps some advanced alien race planted fully constructed, reproducing
    organisms on a hospitable earth some time in the distant past. IN that case,
    someone other than God would have designed these features of the biological
    world. Sure, it’s far-fetched; but it’s possible. For this reason,
    intelligent design arguments in biology do not normally entail theistic
    conclusions even if many people suspect God is lurking somewhere in the
    background.” Jay Wesley Richards, “Proud Obstacles & a Reasonable Hope,”
    Touchstone, July/August 1999, p. 29-32, p. 31

    When I read things like this, I wonder why Christians see such hope in the
    ID movement. Are we to be convinced of God's existence when some alien race
    might have created us? Here is what Johnson himself has had to say on the
    topic:

    glenn

    see http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
    for lots of creation/evolution information



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 19 2000 - 15:31:17 EDT