Re: Flood

From: Harry Cook (hcook@oanet.com)
Date: Wed Jul 19 2000 - 01:45:03 EDT

  • Next message: Bryan R. Cross: "Re: natural selection in salvation history(wasJohnson//evolutionimplies ath..."

    From: "Diane Roy" <Dianeroy@peoplepc.com>
    To: <asa@calvin.edu>, <dfsiemensjr@juno.com>
    Subject: Re: Flood
    Date sent: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 19:46:09 -0700

     
      One of the Roy's wrote

      This is a typical misrepresentation that verges on outright lying. On pages 27 and 78 Woodmorappe proposes using an outfall per Turnbull (1967). Page 32 simply mentions the draining of liquid waste over board but not how. Do you know what an outfall is? A gated outfall is entirely logical
    and workable as it allows liquid to flow only one way -- out of the vessel. With the animals on the 2nd and 3rd floors, manure would be dumped to the bottom floor. Liquid could be channeled on the upper floors to "pipes" which run down to the gated outfalls. Only when the "water" pressure in
    the pipe exceeds the water pressure outside will the gates open. As the vessel rocks from side to side, the outfall on the higher side of the vessel would experience less pressure, the gated outflow opens and the liquid inside flows outward, dumping urine overboard. Such outfalls need not be on
    the bottom of the vessel, but may also be on the sides near the bottom.

      Another
      suggestion is to introduce earthworms into the waste sump (pp. 34f). This
      is plausible for horse and sheep manure that is urine free, but cow
      manure, even without urine, is too moist and will drown the worms.

      On page 27, Woodmorappe propose the separation of cattle manure from urine. This would allow for dryer manure which worms could survive in. Worms are just one proposal for dealing with manure, what may not work for one type of manure may work on another.

      Need I
      say more about the brilliant quality of his solutions to problems
      connected with the universal flood?

      Compared to woodmorappe you are a chimp, chump.

    I (H Cook) would ask, respectfully of course, whether it's possible to carry on
    these silly discussions elsewhere? And if it has to be on this e-mail list,
    whether the insults and ad hominem comments could be left off?

    Harry Cook
    --------------------
    Harry Cook
    15032 84 Ave
    Edmonton, AB T5R 3X5

    phone: 780-489-8563
    email: hcook@oanet.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 19 2000 - 00:30:11 EDT