In a message dated 7/4/2000, Bryan Cross wrote:
<< I believe the solution is to approach every problem with a genuine search
for natural explanations, but with the willingness to acknowledge the
possibility of (direct) divine action. That avoids the error of occasionalism
(which you describe as
'God-of-the-Gaps theology eating everything up) on the one hand, and the
error of
methodological naturalism on the other hand. >>
It seems to me that this statement sums up the arguments on the thread of
"Johnson and intelligent design." Is this not a statement on which we can
all agree?
Bob
Is there any dissent to the statement?
Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 05 2000 - 06:18:45 EDT