> From: Bryan Cross <crossbr@SLU.EDU>
> > > Dawkins writes, "Darwin made it possible
> > >to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist." If Darwinism requires intelligent
> > >direction, then Dawkins couldn't make that statement.
> >
>
> In response to David and Joel, of course, I wasn't agreeing with Dawkins's
> statement, just giving an example of the way in which Darwinism is typically
> portrayed by scientists as needing nothing more than law and chance. Neither the
> existence of atheists prior to Darwin nor the religious beliefs of Darwin himself
> nor the identification of the argument from design with Christianity are relevant
> to my point.
>
Bryan:
Do you diagree with Dawkins statement? Why?
I will be out of town for until at least July 7 so you and others will
be spared a quick reply.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel W. Cannon | (724)223-6146
Physics Department |
Washington and Jefferson College |
Washington, PA 15301 |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 01 2000 - 08:58:18 EDT