Re: Polkinghorne

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Sat Mar 18 2000 - 11:10:34 EST

  • Next message: glenn morton: "Neandertal origin of Bull Fighting?"

    Ted Davis wrote:
    >
    > John Polkinghorne is (MNO) the finest writer on science and faith of the
    > present generation of writers. I only wish he'd started younger, but then
    > he might not have had a large enough scientific reputation to get a hearing.
    >
    > I will have much to say about his work in the December 2000 issue of Zygon,
    > for whom I wrote an appreciation. I can't repeat my points here for various
    > reasons, but suffice it to say that I especially recommend Belief in God in
    > an Age of Science and Faith of a Physicist. It sounds like Mr Shermer did
    > not read this latter book, or else that his particular bias prevented him
    > from understanding its tone. On this aspect of Polkinghorne--his
    > refreshingly modest way of articulating deeply held convictions--see my
    > review in the Nov/Dec 1998 American Scientist, available on my webpage.
    >
    > I think Polkinghorne should be "required reading" for all on this listserve.
    > No exceptions.

    Ted - I agree to a considerable extent with your positive assessment. That being said,
    I there are some points of P's that I take issue with. Specifically -
            1) Though the type of natural theology he endorses is modest, I still
                think it's dangerous. Natural theology needs to be kept on a very
                tight leash.
            2) I appreciate the concerns of P & others about a "block universe" but
                there are problems of both physics & theology with the claim that the
                future just doesn't exist.
            3) Pedagogically, I wish he'd give a little more attention to the role
                of classical physics: the scientifically untutored may get the impression
                from his books that physics is quantum mechanics + big bang + chaos theory.
    I just finished writing a review of _Science and Theology: An Introduction_ for
    _Currents in Theology and Mission_. While I have some of these caveats, I think the
    book is a good introduction to the field, though not as in depth as _The Faith of a
    Physicist_.
                                                            Shalom,
                                                            George
                     

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 11:09:56 EST