Re: ID:philosophy or scientific theory?

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2000 - 07:12:07 EST

  • Next message: Ted Davis: "Pennock's book"

    glenn morton wrote:
    >
    > At 10:13 PM 3/8/00 -0500, George Murphy wrote:
    > > BTW, has anyone noticed that very little that's discussed on this list
    > makes any
    > >reference to Christ?
    >
    > I would suggest that this is because we all basically agree there.
    > Agreement is boring--differences can be debated and that is fun.

            May it be so! But the problem is that the things which are debated seldom
    brought into any connection with what should be the center & basis of Christian thought.
    I don't mean that the answer to every question is "Jesus" or that all disagreements can
    be resolved by referring to the cross. But when ID, irreducible complexity, the flood,
    functional integrity, fossils, imago dei, the big bang, apparent age &c can all be
    discussed by Christians at great length with little attempt to relate them to the
    christological center then something is awry.
                                                    Shalom,
                                                    George
                                                    
    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 09 2000 - 07:27:50 EST