glenn morton wrote:
>
> At 06:42 PM 1/24/00 -0800, Arthur V. Chadwick wrote:
> >At 10:05 PM 01/22/2000 +0000, Glenn wrote:
> >>Over last weekend I finished reading THe Fifth Miracle by Paul Davies. It
> >>is a fascinating, popular level account of the search for the origin of
> >>life. He reports some fascinating information about RNA research which
> >>comes very close to creating life in the testtube. I will quote him at
> >length.
> >
> >This is a good example of what haoppens whe a physicist starts talking
> >about molecular biology. He doesn't have a clue.
>
> Give evidence not opinion. :-)
> glenn
>
> Foundation, Fall and Flood
> Adam, Apes and Anthropology
> http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
>
> Lots of information on creation/evolution
*************
Is it true that Davies is an example of a physicist gone mad? Obviously
this is a real problem and fortunately someone here is letting us in on
this tradegy.
Would it not be so nice to simply dismiss critics by asserting that they
simply don't know what they are saying because one says that in ones
opinion that they are not sufficiently or properly educated.
A good example would be Albert E since he was simply a patent examiner
without a bid deal education.
Please:
Perhaps you would like to publish a list of who is properly educated to
speak as to what subject so the rest of us can get into proper thinking.
Bert M.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 24 2000 - 23:16:06 EST