At 09:42 PM 1/16/00 -0500, George Murphy wrote:
> Does Genesis then "indicate" ~25% helium abundance from the big bang?
>The "logic" is precisely the same & in fact leads to the ultimate
conclusion that
>all true science is "indicated by" (& not just compatible with) the Bible.
But the
>fact that the Bible is God's Word doesn't mean that it says everything
true that
>can be said.
The Bible doesn't talk about any details at all of the big bang. Howver, it
does talk about at least one detail of the creation of life which has huge
consequences--that is, the land created living things! If the land did the
bringing forth, what exactly can that be other than evolution? God didn't
create life directly which rules out special creation and it rules out
progressive creation as normally defined because it requires God act
directly. The only thing left is evolution. Rather than telling me what you
think of my ideas, why don't you tell me what else there is other than
evolution that can fit the creation of life by the land? That would be far
more useful than what you are doing.
>> PC doesn't generally acknowledge mediate creation.
>
> You lost me. PC? Political correctness. Pierre Curie?
For goodness sake, progressive creation! This abbreviation has been used on
this list for a long time!
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 16 2000 - 22:17:06 EST