At 06:00 PM 1/16/00 -0500, George Murphy wrote:
> 1) Glenn's closing paragraph is correct & important but I think it's an
>overstatement to say that Genesis 1 "indicates evolution." It would be
more accurate to
>say that with its language about mediated creation it is "open to an
evolutionary
>interpretation."
A quibble. You keep saying this but I don't agree. Since the scientific
evidence indicates evolution, and since God's truth is one (not dualistic)
and since the Bible is God's Word, and should be truth, how in the world
can you say it doesn't indicate evolution. THe logic requires it. PC
doesn't generally acknowledge mediate creation.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 16 2000 - 21:01:29 EST