Quantization is like pregnancy. Either you are or you aren't.
The latter
>interpretation results in maps showing vast areas of empty space and
>"walls" of galaxies. If Arp is correct, then there may be no "walls" of
>galaxies. Do you agree, Glenn, or do I have this wrong?
Actually, I am wanting to move away from a debate about Arp. I don't find
his views worth the time.
>Just trying to keep an open mind. The caustic comments Arp received from
>some of his reviewers are similar to those I've received because of my
>own views on coal, which I know are firmly grounded in the data - data
>for which a couple of geologists here in Alabama recently admitted to me
>they have no explanation. I guess my own experience makes me a little
>more sympathetic towards Arp.
Maybe, but remember this, when I was a YEC, I received similar caustic
treatment towards my YEC views. I was wrong and my views deserved such
treatment. When I peddle an oil deal, and fail to sell it, the market
place is telling me something. It is telling me that something is wrong
with my deal--either the science or the economics. The market place of
ideas is telling Arp the same thing. It is also telling you the same thing
about your like from coal to the global flood.
glenn
Foundation, Fall and Flood
Adam, Apes and Anthropology
http://www.flash.net/~mortongr/dmd.htm
Lots of information on creation/evolution