<< There is probably no strict rule of the sort you mentioned & I don't think
(as I noted in a parallel) that it's necessary to insist that the
consequence of
the command be instantaneous. I think the question is, however, whether the
sense of
the waw consecutive with two indicatives allows the intervention, even
though tacitly,
of other events, which are part of the same overall action.>>
In Psalm 105:34 "He spake and the locusts came" is a waw consecutive with two
indicatives, yet Ex 10:13 (19:13 in my first note is a typo) shows that there
is an intervention of an east wind between the two actions, and that wind is
a part of the same overall action. At least, that is how I see it. So what
do you see wrong with this besides my typo?
Paul S.