I'm curious, do you (or anybody out there) know what scientific claims
the two unsuccessful suits were based on? And on what grounds the courts
declined to make Rimmer pay?
An obvious choice would be Jesus calling the mustard the smallest of all
seeds. I suppose Rimmer could have claimed the Bible was accurate in its
reporting and that it was Jesus who made the "scientific error," but that
doesn't sound like a strategy Rimmer would have taken.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Dr. Allan H. Harvey | aharvey@boulder.nist.gov |
| Physical and Chemical Properties Division | "Don't blame the |
| National Institute of Standards & Technology | government for what I |
| 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80303 | say, or vice versa." |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------