Re: Scientific American

John M. Lynch (jmlynch@geocities.com)
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 23:56:23 -0700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BEDAE7.208F10E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bert M. wrote ...

>Eugene C. Scott does a hatchet job on Phillip Johnson using a review of

Thats Eugenie Scott -

> For example, he claims that modern ID

Eugenie's a she.

Thirdly, even accepting PEJ asked to reply to this piece and "SA will =
not let Johnson respond", one should remember that journals =
traditionally do not allow lengthy responses to reviews of this nature =
by authors, never mind other parties. PEJ is, of course, free to write a =
letter to the letters section of SA, or for that matter an essay for =
First Things bemoaning the snow job.=20

Lastly, Pennock's book is quite good and is written with a philosophical =
flair sadly missing by many ID components.=20

-jml

=20

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BEDAE7.208F10E0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">

Bert M. wrote ...

>Eugene C. Scott does a hatchet job on Phillip Johnson using a = review=20 of

Thats Eugenie Scott -

> For example, he = claims that=20 modern ID

Eugenie's a she.

Thirdly, even accepting PEJ asked to = reply to this=20 piece and "SA will not let Johnson respond", one should = remember=20 that journals traditionally do not allow lengthy responses to reviews of = this=20 nature by authors, never mind other parties. PEJ is, of course, free to = write a=20 letter to the letters section of SA, or for that matter an essay for = First=20 Things bemoaning the snow job.

Lastly, Pennock's book is = quite good=20 and is written with a philosophical flair sadly missing by many ID = components.=20

-jml

 

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BEDAE7.208F10E0--