Re: miracles as smokescreen

Craig Rusbult (rusbult@vms2.macc.wisc.edu)
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:34:35 -0500

George says,
>some of these miracles cannot be so understood, & should be
>thought of as being beyond the possibilities of natural processes.

>The list isn't exhaustive but those are the important reasons.

two other important reasons:
Sometimes a miracle is to show a person (or persons) that God does
exist and is "actively doing things" in the world. { If none of these
types of experiences had occurred in my life, as both first-hand and
second-hand experiences, I might not be a Christian now. }
Another reason is if God wants ONE THING to occur instead of
ANOTHER THING, if God wants history to unfold in a certain way,
and miraculous-appearing action is needed.

The potential role of theistic action (miraculous-appearing and/or
normal-appearing) is examined in my overview, at
http://www.sit.wisc.edu/~crusbult/origins/main.htm#fi

>NONE OF THESE APPLY TO THE CREATION OF LIFE, SPECIATION,...

They certainly do apply, if God designed the universe to be
SELF-OPERATING so natural processes would allow everything needed
for life (sunshine, DNA & proteins,...) without being SELF-ASSEMBLING.

In the section of my overview cited above, is the following quote:
"miraculous-appearing theistic action ... eliminates a need for total
self-assembly. Maybe there is an essential tension between assembly
and operation, and a universe with optimal operation cannot also be
self-assembling. { To illustrate, Walter Bradley asks whether a car
designed to change its own spark plugs would be a good design, or if
this unnecessary requirement would hinder the car's effectiveness in
other, more important ways. }"

----------------------------

To minimize the inevitable replies -- yes, of course, "self operating"
means "with God's sustaining power,..."

>The creation of life does not validate anyone's call.

As mentioned above, this is not the only reason for a miracle.

Craig Rusbult