re: X is intelligently designed means

Keith B Miller (kbmill@ksu.edu)
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 20:40:56 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Ikeda: "re: X is intelligently designed means"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Dembski and Nelson at MIT and Tufts"

This question of the meaning of ID that frustrates me the most is whether
it can accommodate theistic evolution (continuous creation) or not.
Statements from ID proponents have been inconsistent on this. Phil Johnson
and others, while sometimes assenting that ID is not _a priori_
antagonistic to evolution directed and guided by God, nonetheless are very
stringent in their rhetoric against those of us who hold just such a view.

Keith

Keith B. Miller
Department of Geology
Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506
kbmill@ksu.ksu.edu
http://www-personal.ksu.edu/~kbmill/

Next message: Tim Ikeda: "re: X is intelligently designed means"
Previous message: Pim van Meurs: "RE: Dembski and Nelson at MIT and Tufts"