Re: >Re: intell. des. and Berra's folly

Glenn R. Morton (grmorton@waymark.net)
Wed, 03 Jun 1998 19:52:50 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Glenn R. Morton: "Human skull evolution"
Previous message: E G M: ">Re: intell. des. and Berra's folly"

At 09:07 AM 6/3/98 -0700, E G M wrote:
>Yes, of course, the mouse trap is a macro system used by Behe as an
>*example* of a I.C. system that could not have come together
>darwinistically. In that case you are right and I am wrong but let me
>emphasize that the trap was used as an *example* and that the trap is
>not a biological entity either.
>
>I guess what you want to find is a biological I.C. system that did
>indeed evolved darwinistically in order to refute Behe's argument.

this is not really a serious request because it is like Catch-22. You are
unlikely to agree that anything is evolved. And then use that to claim that
there is nothing to refute Behe. Heads you win, tails I lose. Godd debate
tactics---bad science and logic.

glenn

Adam, Apes and Anthropology
Foundation, Fall and Flood
& lots of creation/evolution information
http://www.isource.net/~grmorton/dmd.htm

Next message: Glenn R. Morton: "Human skull evolution"
Previous message: E G M: ">Re: intell. des. and Berra's folly"