Re: >Re: >RE: What does ID mean?

Glenn R. Morton (grmorton@waymark.net)
Sun, 26 Apr 1998 16:54:36 -0500

At 01:23 PM 4/26/98 -0400, George Murphy wrote:

> As a general relativist I have to confess that the theory isn't
>confirmed with the number of experiments/observations as, e.g., QED.
>But it agrees with all the relevant observations made so far.

Well, I am getting to do this a lot lately. I stand corrected.