Re: Predicting eyes

Arthur V. Chadwick (chadwicka@swac.edu)
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 13:12:58 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Campbell: "Re: Testing in historical science"
Previous message: Arthur V. Chadwick: "Re: Warning labels"
In reply to: David Campbell: "Predicting eyes"
Next in thread: Bryan Bishop: "Re: Predicting eyes"
Next in thread: Moorad Alexanian: "Re: Predicting eyes"

At 03:01 PM 11/18/97 -0400, David wrote:
>Bilateral symmetry is predictable from evolution-

Name me some observation in nature that is not in hindsight pridictible
from evolution. The point is evolution by definition (since it is assumed
true) explains everyting and thus explains nothing.

Art
http://chadwicka.swau.edu

Next message: David Campbell: "Re: Testing in historical science"
Previous message: Arthur V. Chadwick: "Re: Warning labels"
In reply to: David Campbell: "Predicting eyes"
Next in thread: Bryan Bishop: "Re: Predicting eyes"
Next in thread: Moorad Alexanian: "Re: Predicting eyes"