Re: T/D #1 (Theistic/Deistic definitions)

Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@UNCWIL.EDU)
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 16:22:12 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Eduardo G. Moros: "ASA - October 1997: Re: Luke and Peter (was E and C)"
Previous message: Craig Rusbult: "Re: T/D #2 (sustenance & concurrence)"
Maybe in reply to: Craig Rusbult: "T/D #1 (Theistic/Deistic definitions)"
Next in thread: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Re: T/D #1 (Theistic/Deistic definitions)"

I am a bit baffled, what is an intelligent design theorist? I can understand
those who accept and use the Anthropic Principle and theorize with it--the
Anthropic Principle is an explanation without leading to any predictions.
However, what kind of theory can you do if you believe in an intelligent
designer? I believe one can claim that our universe was brought into
existence by an Intelligent Designer, but that is as much of a "prediction"
that you can make with such a "theory." Perhaps someone can enlighten me.

Moorad

Next message: Eduardo G. Moros: "ASA - October 1997: Re: Luke and Peter (was E and C)"
Previous message: Craig Rusbult: "Re: T/D #2 (sustenance & concurrence)"
Maybe in reply to: Craig Rusbult: "T/D #1 (Theistic/Deistic definitions)"
Next in thread: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Re: T/D #1 (Theistic/Deistic definitions)"