>Re: T/D #2 (sustenance & concurrence)

Eduardo G. Moros (moros_eg@castor.wustl.edu)
Wed, 22 Oct 1997 17:03:24 -0600

I like ID (and IC) as defined in Behe's book. All nature does not fall into
those defenitions. Even "random" procecess can be considered ID and IC.

I have been following these writings and all I can say is that God is
constantly being constraint in one way or another when we should know that:

"His path are beyond tracing out"

Salu2

Eduardo

> Re: T/D #2 (sustenance & concurrence)
> I'm also curious about this: do
> any on this list who hold to a concept of Intelligent Design (ID) also
> subscribe to some version of the "free will defense" when it comes to
> accounting for evil? If so, how is that possible? Isn't ID an inherently
> deterministic system? Does it not rule out the random, the arbitrary, the
> unpredictable, the genuinely "free" event or state of affairs? If not, just
> what kind of a "design" is it, anyway, and what would make it so "intelligent"?
>
> Tom Pearson