Re: >Romans 1

Moorad Alexanian (alexanian@UNCWIL.EDU)
Wed, 15 Oct 1997 13:38:27 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Don N Page: ""Creationist" and "creationism""
Previous message: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Romans 1"
Maybe in reply to: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Romans 1"

At 10:44 AM 10/15/97 -0600, Eduardo G. Moros wrote:
>I can understand the creationist stand although I never quite accepted it, and
>nowadays I'm personally convinced that their interpretation is demanding
more of
>Gen1 than what is was meant with it in the "beginning". The teachings from
>Gen1-2 are profound.

[deleted]

As I said in a previous post, I am new on the net and am somewhat confused
on the use of some terms. For instance, am a creationist if I believe that
there is a Creator but have not committed myself to a particular view on how
the Creator brought the universe into being?

Moorad

Next message: Don N Page: ""Creationist" and "creationism""
Previous message: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Romans 1"
Maybe in reply to: Eduardo G. Moros: ">Romans 1"