However. To investigate, for example, the chemical origin of life, one
has to make some assumptions.....................
>Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 11:31:45 -0600 (MDT)
>From: "James K. Gruetzner" <jkgruet@unm.edu>
>Reply-To: "James K. Gruetzner" <jkgruet@unm.edu>
>To: Asa Calvin <asa@Calvin.EDU>
>Subject: Re: Lazarus and the origen of life:
>
>On Tue, 30 Sep 1997, Eduardo G. Moros wrote:
>
>> Lazarus body was dead and decaying, and then a Jesus command it was
>> alive and well. If we believe that Christ Jesus could do that, Can
we
>> not also believe that the origen of life escapes a purely
naturalistic
>> explanation?
>
> Eduardo, the question is not "can God do" nor "can we believe
>that...", but "did God do" and "do we believe that...." In others
>words, there is not debate over whether God *can* do something; the
>discussion is over what (and how) He did things.
>
>Yours in Christ, | ----Solo Christus----
> James | In faith and in science,
>James K. Gruetzner <jkgruet@unm.edu> | All truth is God's truth.
>"A bruised reed he will not break; a smoldering wick he will not snuff
>out."
>
>
>
>