Re: Stott

Joel Peter Anderson (joela@nts.umn.edu)
Sat, 17 May 1997 18:51:03 -0500 (CDT)

On Sat, 17 May 1997, Paul Arveson wrote:

> Thanks, Allan, for your notes on Stott.
>
> The social implications of this are interesting -- as you suggested.
> Stott apparently represents an 'anti-science sentiment detector' in
> the US. Of course, it may be nothing but the general anti-authority
> sentiments. Anyway, please describe the audience as well as Stott --
> what church affiliation, age, education, etc.

Please don't. Or if you do, address it in email outside the list - while
this speculation may be of interest to some, it strikes me as being an
gossip. Enumeration of Stott's bad science is one thing; combat it with
good science, not bashing of his audience.

-------------------------------------------------
joel anderson * joela@nts.umn.edu 625-7389