This may not be worth the time. I was at a table with Fitelson and
Plantinga. Fitelson, after hearing Plantinga and talking to him, felt
that their paper didn't get at the heart of Plantinga's argument--at
least thats my recollection. I believe that Fitelson and Sober made a
probabilistic argument that was still vulnerable to Plantinga's
"defeater" (you'll have to read Plantinga's paper for this). Fitelson
is a graduate student and it may be the case that Sober may not agree,
in which case it may still be worth a read (it won't be a light read).
-------
Joel W. Cannon
Dept. of Physics
Centenary College of Louisiana
P. O. Box 41188
Shreveport, LA 71134-1188
(318)869-5160
(318)869-5026 FAX