>I certainly agree that it's a uniquely human activity. And it certainly
>could imply lust, as well as the ability to interpret abstractions.
>However, I'm not convinced that it implies religion.
If it implies lust, then it MUST imply moral accountability. And if the
maker was morally accountable, then regardless of whether he personally
had a religion or not, he needed one.
glenn
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm