You wrote:
> I also have to admit that the idea of God making man by
>resurrecting the miscarriage of an ape repels me. I much prefer Roy
>Clouser's revelation approach, albeit it explicialy allows for a
> continuing presence of non_Adamites.
Can you describe Clouser's revelation approach? Thanks. However...
Never one to let a criticism go by :-) I would ask which is more
repugnant?
1. Being evolved from an ape with no Adam and Eve and the possibility that
there was no Fall and thus no redemption?
2. Having a God who goes out of his way to create the appearance of a
relationship to the ape (the pseudogenes I spoke of a couple of days ago)
when in fact we are not related to the ape? This, of course, raises the
possibility that God can not be trusted!
3. What I have suggested?
Foundation,Fall and Flood
http://members.gnn.com/GRMorton/dmd.htm