><pre>
>Quardu
>3000 ft \ elevation
> \
> \
> \
> \
> \
> \
> \ Shuruppak
> \ |
> - - ---- 20 ft elevation.
> |<- 1000 km -> |
>
></pre>
>
>This is the elevation profile that you have in going from lower
>MEsopotamia to Qardu in Turkey.
Glenn, I think this is an excellent example of why the ark is unlikely
to have landed on a mountaintop, something I never cared for anyway.
Imagine all those animals trying to climb off a mountaintop. They would
grumble all the way to the bottom.
The Armenian hills look like the best candidate to me. Do you have any
graphs to show how the ark could not have landed anywhere?
Still your friend,
Dick Fischer
*****************************************************************
* *
* THE ORIGINS SOLUTION *
* *
* An Answer in the Creation - Evolution Debate *
* *
* Web page - http://www.orisol.com *
* *
*****************************************************************