On Tue, 5 Mar 1996, Scott A. Oakman wrote:
> OK folks--I could use your help.
>
> Our church booktable was recently "graced" by a (well, I think I can say this
> here...) HORRENDOUS book for children entitled "Dinosaurs and the Bible". I
> knew I was in trouble when the preface essentially drew a line in the sand
> between "Scientists" (boo hiss) and "The Word of God". Actually, I should have
> guessed what was coming from the cover illustration of Dinosaurs cavorting
> around the Ark...but I digress. The book "majored" on attempting to show that
> Dinosaurs and humans lived together (insert Paluxy river tracks here) and maybe
> still lived today (Japanese "rotting undersea pleisiosaur" picture,
> word-of-mouth reports from the Congo...). There was even a page detailed how
> Tyrannosaurs might have been created to eat fruit--thereby suggesting that they
> could have lived in a death-free, pre-Fall world as well.
>
> I *diplomatically* (really!) suggested to our manager that I didn't think that
> it was a very good book, mentioned that even ICR was distancing itself from the
> Paluxy river stuff, etc.... and was openly received for (perhaps in spite of?)
> my views. (Actually--I feel fortunate that our church generally refrains from
> litmus tests...) Now this week, she specifically approached me and asked if I
> knew of any children's resources that might be better! Of course, dinos are a
> big deal--I have a 4 year old too--and I'm stumped for ideas.
>
> So I submit this to you--what do you know of that is creationist in *theology*,
> but open to taking the "book of nature" at face value? Sort of "Hugh Ross for
> kids". I eagerly await your answers...
>
> Scott
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Scott Oakman Graduate Program in Neuroscience
> University of Minnesota MD/PhD Program
> oakma001@maroon.tc.umn.edu
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly.
> The rich have always objected to being governed at all.
> --G.K. Chesterton.
>
>