Science in Christian Perspective
Letter to the Editor
Author Responds to Critic
David J. Krause
Science Division
Henry Ford Community College
Dearborn, Michigan 48128
From: JASA 34 (June 1982): 123.
D. M. D'Aria has criticized my paper "Apparent Age and its Reception in the 19th Century" (Journal ASA Sept. 1980), characterizing it as a "misconstrued analysis" (Letters, Journal ASA Dec. 1981). Meaningful criticism is always welcome, but how accurate are his/her charges? I respond as follows:
D'Aria claims that "Krause ignores completely" differences in the use of apparent age by Gosse and more recent creationists. In fact, even though my paper is historical and not comparative, I commented at length on precisely these differences, summarizing with the statement, "Thus, apparent age as used by present day "creationists" does not correspond to its consistent use by
Gosse (note 34). 1 cannot see how I could possibly have been more explicit, yet D'Aria somehow has managed to miss this. D'Aria also feels that I do not recognize that the recent creationist version of apparent age is of a softer, less radical nature than that of Gosse, stating "they certainly do not fly off to the extremes of