Science in Christian Perspective
Bad Philosophy and Bad Theology
Robert E. Kofahl
Creation-Science Research Center
6709 Convoy Court San Diego, California 92111
From: JASA 31 (September 1979): 176.
At least one statement contained in "The Significance of Being
Human,"
Journal ASA, March 1979, demands response: "It therefore follows that, at
least in principle, if a scientist were to assemble non-living matter
in exactly
the same way that it is assembled in a living human being, he would then have
produced a genuine living human being, a person for whom Christ died." Not
so, for several reasons.
Even in principle it would not follow, unless the philosophical
principle of dualism
were false and the principle of materialistic monism were true, a possibility
which no Bible-believing Christian can accept. Furthermore, such a being, even
if it were a self-conscious organism, would not be a person for whom
Christ died,
for Christ died only for the race of Adam, for He "took hold" of the
seed of Abraham, not of angels or of others races or kinds of beings (Hebrews
2:16).
Thus it seems to me that the idea you have propounded constitutes
both bad philosophy
and bad theology.