Science in Christian Perspective
Letter to the Editor
Disagree with Spinka on Abortion
Jerry Bergman
Department of Educational Foundations and Inquiry
Bowling Green
State University
Bowling Green, Ohio 43403
From: JASA 30 (September 1978): 143-144.
Re: "Society and Abortion,"
Journal ASA 30, No. 1, March,
1978, Spinka
implied that mentally retarded children were better off not being born. This is
a very narrow, one-sided approach to a problem which has many
ramifications. One
whom has worked extensively with retarded children, at least educable
and trainable
mentally retarded children, finds that in many ways these citizens
can be happy,
well-adjusted, productive contributors to society. While those of us
who are not
retarded may have a feeling of superiority, believing we are "better than
they are," this is a very narrow view which extensive work with retarded
children and adults usually rectifies. Within their own world they can be quite
happy and not uncommonly find more rewarding lives than non-retarded people. As
a whole these people are much less of a burden on society than criminals, the
insane, and some may add, infants, the chronically sick, the unemployed and a
number of other groups. My own personal experience is that I have
never seen happier
children than those who are supposedly "suffering" from "Down's
syndrome." At Bowling Green State University, I am involved in
teacher training
programs where a number of our students are preparing for careers in
working with
the mentally retarded. These students find this work extremely
rewarding and fulfilling.
It is time we remove some of the prejudices and misconceptions
against this group
of Americans we have labeled retarded. Relative to the desirability of aborting
a child who would most likely be retarded, I for one, would not want
to make the
decision that another person, even if that person is retarded, should not have
life. Nor would I want to make the decision that a child born with
another defect,
whether structural or otherwise, is better off not alive. If anyone should make
this decision it should be the child himself. If the child makes the decision
in the negative,
it is termed suicide, which is likewise condemned by society. At
least among retarded
children, this alternative is rarely evoked, even when the means available to
do so are readily available.