Science
in Christian Perspective
Letter to the Editor
Genetics and Eve
Martin LaBar
Division of Science
Central WesleYan College
Central,
South Carolina
29630
From: JASA 24 (June 1972): 77.
George Jennings (Journal ASA 23, 139 (1971))
asks for the reaction of Christian geneticists to the Incarnation and
the creation
of Eve. I believe I qualify on both counts. Reaction: the creation of Eve was
a miraculous event, and so was the Incarnation.
Parthenogenesis may have happened in man (see
Chapter 14 of Pregnancy: Conception and Heredity,
Blaisdell, 1965 by Erieweiser for an interesting discussion of a
possible female
human produced by parthenogenesis and of related matters); Weiser
cites S. Balfour-Lynn
in the June 30, 1966 Lancet, but since females have an XX chromosome
constitution
and males an XY, there seems no way of producing a male human without
the assistance
of a Y-bearing cell. Male turkeys have been parthenogenetically produced, but
here the female has an XY chromosome constitution, and the male is XX. (Olsen,
M.W and S. J. Marsden"Natural Parthenogenesis in Turkey
Eggs" Science
120: 545-546, 1954; Olsen, M.W. "Segregation and Replication of
Chromosomes
in Turkey Parthenogenesis", Nature 212: 435-436, 1966; Poole, H.K. and MW.
Olsen, "The Sex of Parthenogenetic Turkey Embryos" J.
Heredity 48: 217-218,
1957.)
It might be possible, ebromosomally speaking, for a male to produce a single XX
cell or a group of XX cells if certain processes known to occur in
other organisms
(such as the turkey) do occur in man, but this would he just a first
step, itself
unlikely, in producing a viable female from a male. In other words, genetically
speaking, Eve is possible, but the Genesis account leaves the much
more important
question of how she developed from a group of cells to a (presumed)
adult to God's
direct work, in my opinion.