Science in Christian Perspective
Halfway Home
A. ROBERT DENTON
Denton House, Akron, Ohio 44309
From: JASA 23 (September 1971): 108-111.
BACKGROUND
Since the beginning of the reformation movement within corrections during the
Eighteenth century, the problem of releasing an offender to society
has been the
focal point of theories. With the institution of the indeterminate sentence and
consequently parole, the problem took a new slant. Instead of releasing a man
who had served his entire sentence, the offender was given an early discharge
based upon such factors as good behavior, the nature of his past record and a
prognosis of his projected environment. However, with this parole, the offender
was placed under the supervision of an officer and assigned certain
rules of behavior
for a set period of time.
While this has been a step in the right direction, many problems
existed and still
exist. It is the purpose of this article to look at one of those problems and
relate one solution which has recently appeared and which is gaining a strong
foothold. It is largely related through the perspective of the special endeavor
with which the author is presently involved.
The nature of the problem of the reorientation of a personality that has had a
number of influences militating a variety of reactions, has been largely that
of removing the shock of transferring an individual from a very
structured setting
into an extremely free and yet demanding society. Many individuals
can withstand
this shock and make the transformation with varying degrees of
functional ability.
At the same time there is a residue comprised of those for whom the demands of
a free society are so overwhelming that their consequences appear
under the heading
"recidivism," a residue for whom institutionalization, while it has
protected society by removing the offender's presence, has failed to
implant the
responsibilities inherent to perpetuation of that society. For
instance, how does
an individual with a variety of internal conflicts and weaknesses develop the
initiative and responsibility to shoulder the obligations of a
competitive community
which is itself uncertain of its own values and inconsistent in the maintenance
of its demands?
How does an individual with a variety of internal conflicts and weaknesses develop the initiative and responsibility to shoulder the obligations of a competitive community which is itself uncertain of its own values and inconsistent in the maintenance of its demands?
It was with such a problem in mind that within the past fifteen years
an old idea
has had a rather new adaptation. Hence, the appearance of the halfway
house, the purpose of which is to create a temporary residential buffer-zone to
lessen the stress of the transition between two extremely different societies
and to facilitate individual treatment within the free community
where ultimately
the ex-convict must learn to cope with his problems. It is only in
this environment
that the kinds of change necessary can best be advanced, assessed, and tested.
This cannot be accomplished in the unreal vacuum of incarceration.
While many, perhaps most, who are released have a place of residence
and an occupation
awaiting them, what becomes of those who have no family or outside contacts who
may act as sponsors and aid in obtaining employment? What becomes of
the man whose
family doesn't want him or whose family situation is so unfavorable
that he cannot
be allowed to return to them? What becomes of the man who has extremely limited
job training, emotional problems, limited funds and uncertain
circumstances? From
the other side of the coin, how does the parole or probation officer manage to
supervise between approximately sixty and one hundred and thirty cases and give
the controlled situation that is necessitated by certain cases? To answer these
questions the halfway house is rendering itself a ready solution, as
is witnessed
by the evergrowing list of members upon the roster of the International Halfway
House Association.
It should be mentioned that the idea of halfway houses in a limited
sense is not
new. In 1817, the Massachusetts legislature introduced a
recommendation that the
state supply a lodging system for ex-convicts who were destitute. Switzerland
has operated a home continuously since 1905. Over the generations
there have been
many homes or "hostels" operated by religious and
humanitarian parties
which offered temporary shelter and provisions for the ex-offender. While the
halfway house has sprung from this ground it should not be simply equated with
its predecessors. The opening of the Dismus House in St. Louis by the
"Hoodlum
Priest" and St. Leonard's House in Chicago brought a new strain
of operation
which added the factor of professional staff and program. Here the application
of more sophisticated personality techniques, the use of records and evaluation
constitutes the difference between the "Hostel" and the halfway house
or residential treatment center, as it is sometimes called.
THE DENTON HOUSE
With the recounting of the above, the author wishes to share the
particular venture
and insights gained in the endeavor which has taken root through the ministry
of a mission with a history dating back to the late 1920's and which immersed
itself in the problems of the poor in an underworld situation. Through the work
of a British immigrant who had become a Christian, the work grew from
an acquired
saloon to a ghetto mission reaching out with welfare assistance,
religious services,
jail visits, boy's camps, prison work and eventually to a unique
ministry to eleven
men who were executed in the electric chair.
As times changed, the mission adjusted. Yet, out of those experiences came the
dream of a home to help ex-convicts who had been contacted on the
inside. Hence,
the plans, the fund-raising, and the eventual opening in July 1965,
of the House
named by the judges of the Common Pleas Court after its founder, the Rev, Bill
Denton.
This year finds the Denton House with one of the first, if not perhaps the only
halfway house built from the foundation to serve that specific
purpose. The home
was originally built to be occupied by seven residents at a time plus
a resident
supervisor. As of January 1970 it was expanded to house twelve men in
ten single
rooms and one double.
Upon arrival, each man is provided with linen, towels, laundry facilities, two
meals per day, and occasionally clothing. Recreation consists of weight lifting
apparatus, pool, ping pong, and TV. At the moment, funds are being
raised to build
an addition to the facility which will expand its capacity to twentytwo rooms
all but one of which will be single occupancy. Also within this new
section will
be additional recreation and office facilities.
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
The assistance of the home has been typical of those movements which
rise to meet
specific needs at specific moments. It has been faced with the
necessity of learning
by doing and borrowing whatever has been found successful or
promising elsewhere.
To this extent, it has been comparable to other such homes. In the
area of programming,
however, we began late and it is not entirely unreasonable to
consider its first
few years of operation as more of a "hostel" than a halfway
house. During
that period, its residents were mainly probationers intermixed with a
few parolees.
These were offered food, lodging, and some personal counseling.
Pragmatism figured to a large extent in the development of the
establishment and
the present stage of the home could well be considered a passing stage in the
evolution of improvement (as time passes, the nature of halfway houses may well
change a number of times as new techniques are tried and renovated). Along the
way, it was found necessary to maintain records beyond the usual name, date in,
and date out routine. Rules were developed and modified as the needs
arose. These
were kept at a minimum and have been periodically refined with the assistance
of the probation and parole authorities. Basically, the rules pertain
to the use
of alcohol, narcotics, weapons, presence of women in dorm rooms, and
hours. Pertaining
to the latter, the men are required to be in at 11 P.M. Sunday through Thursday
and 1:00 A.M. Friday and Saturday. Exceptions are made for special
working hours
and events.
Staff comprises a Director, a resident supervisor, a secretary, a
counselor, and
a liason parole officer from the Adult Parole Authority. Many
services are rendered
through the advisory board which is comprised of mainly professional men whose
fields are directly related to corrections and rehabilitation. The
resident supervisor
manages the facilities and meals are prepared by outside assistance.
The counselor,
who has a Masters Degree in Sociology, carries on the greatest
portion of direct
contact with the residents. He assists in job placements, case
histories, referrals,
group therapy sessions, and two individual counseling sessions per
week. Careful
stress is made to meet each resident on a personal level. Much stress is placed
upon the individual's self-concept and its potential development.
While nothing can substitute for an in-residence
program, the work has received ready assistance from local and state agencies.
Key centers for referral have been the Bureau of Employment, County
Mental Health
Clinic, Municipal Anabuse Program for Alcoholics and the Department
of Welfare.
Finances have been raised solely via private donors and rental monies which net
a maximum of twenty dollars per week for room, board, and all facilities. Rent
money is collected only when the resident becomes financially
capable. Our first
non-private assistance began just January 1, 1970 when the House received State
assistance under a new program with the Adult Parole Authority. As the program
increases so does the necessity for subsidies beyond the private level. In the
last six months, we have established contracts with the Ohio Youth Commission
and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
RESULTS
Success is an abstract word in the field of rehabili-tation because it may have
any number of connotations. It may mean, in our context, the maintenance of a
good job, or marrying and assuming responsibility, setting down the necessary
groundwork for readjustment, or being able to manage one's funds in
such a manner
as not to overdraw one's checking account. Usually, however, it refers to those
who fulfill their periods of parole supervision without any
significant relapses
into serious anti-social behavior.
Statistically, one's success record may vary from day to day as today's example
may be tomorrow's headline. Thankfully, this is seldom the case. The statistics
of the House, based upon one hundred residents, do not significantly
differ from
area parole statistics of a success rate between 70 and 75%. It must be taken
into consideration, though, that the House deals with mainly the
hard-core, poor-risk
group, as the favorable cases already have a number of aspects to
their advantage
and do not need the services of a residential treatment center.
While the long-range goal of the House is to aid in the readjustment of men to
a functional level-in all areas of the personality-success may also mean giving
a chance to the man who is overdue for a release and who has no sponsor. It may
mean the last chance for a man who should be returned to the penal institution
as a parole violator. It also means a place of refuge for the marginal case who
becomes "tight" and needs certain reinforcement. Finally, success may
mean an alternative to incarceration for the man who is a border line case or
for whom probation must be carried out at a level of more intense supervision.
During 1970 we had 74 men at the House-only 5 of whom were returned during that
year. We believe that we have been reasonably successful.
CONCLUSIONS
Over the past three years as Director, the author has had that unique education
best summarized as "serendipitous." As we have compared
notes with other
halfway houses, we have discovered that many of the problems of
development which
we felt were our own particular burdens were actually very similar to
those elsewhere
and had been remedied in some cases. While this presented a measure of comfort,
too often this insight came after we had already learned by hard
experience. Behind
this intercommunication of resident centers is the increasing sophistication of
the halfway
house as a movement. It has been interesting to watch the organization of the
individual houses as they band together to share information, enlist financial
support, and continue the processes of expansion and improvement. It has been
exciting to be a part of that movement as a member of the International Halfway
House Association and its affiliation with the American Corrections
Association.
While the relationship of the Christian Message is subject matter for an entire
treatise, no satisfactory account of the Denton House could be presented with
its exclusion. Nowhere within the program is any religious or
religious activity
forced upon any resident. The staff and Trustees, however, believe that no real
adjustment can be made unless there is also an adjustment of the individual in
terms of his relationship to his Creator and fellow creatures. The message of
forgiveness and mercy are exceptionally related to the nature of the work. The
motto on the halfway house stationery reads: "Peace,
Forgiveness, and Anticipation
of New Life." When a man is reconciled to God, how much easier
it is to reconcile
himself with his fellowman and his society.
It has been found that the program of the House, after a good deal of
experimentation,
must be carried out upon a rather authoritarian (controlled situation) basis.
When the House was run on a basis where the resident did not feel he was taking
part in a program that demanded something of his time and attention,
very little
could be accomplished. Quite often, the problem became extended to
the point where
the House was only a gimmick for sponsorship which the man would soon discard
after release. Under these circumstances no order could be maintained
since there
was nothing within the program to demand compliance with rules,
occupational assistance,
or guidance. It was learned by way of some rough situations that in many cases
"control is therapeutic."
Peculiarly enough, and much to the chagrin of the serious student of
corrections,
one is constantly affronted by those within other related occupations who are
operating with some rather distorted and naive assumptions with regard to the
nature of man. At this point, the author cannot but laud the biblical concept
of looking at man's negative aspects as well as his positive. It is his opinion
that if one is to overemphasize the latter at the cost of a realistic appraisal
of the former, nothing can he accomplished of serious and lasting value. This
opinion has been fortified by the perspective of a number of professionals who
specialize in personality evaluation and seemingly have little understanding of
the client's capacity for deception. While the author is uncertain as
to how much
can be accomplished in the fields of social welfare and counseling
with such superficial
assessment of the client, to operate so within this paricular sphere
of rehabilitation
is to relegate oneself to certain failure, not to mention the embarrassment. It
is the nature of our clients to test and discover whatever weaknesses
or loopholes
exist within the system of counselor and then manipulate that system or person
so as to gain their own ends. Until both parties are aware of this there is no
common ground upon which to build any meaningful communication.
Finally, it is the belief of the author that the work of a halfway house must
be operated upon an all-out basis of endeavor. By that, it is meant the House
must
possess a professionally respectable program and aim towards the
hard-core "poor-risk"
segment. When this is not the case, it is questionable whether its
existence can
be justified in terms of money, time, and prac
ticality. When such is its goal, however, the halfway house far surpasses its
worth as an investment transcending all frustrations with immeasurable value to
society and its constituents.