Science in Christian Perspective
Letter to the editor
Bube, Homer and Berkhout
William F. Campbell, M.D.
Tulloch Memorial Hospital (Hospital Anglais)
S. Marshan,
Tanger
From: JASA 20 (December 1968): 122-123.
During the last three days, I have found myself in bed with a temperature and
a little flu, but enough energy to read some of the latest issues of
the Journal
of the American Scientific Affiliation. Among these were President
Bube's articles
in the March, 1968, journal and the two articles on evolution in the December
1967 Journal by Horner and Berkhout. In addition, various remarks in
the American
Scientific Affiliation News of March 1968 gave me further food for thought.
First of all, 1 would like to mention agreement with much of what
Professor Bube
says in his articles and remarks concerning the fact that we are unknown as an
organization and the Council's decision to hold our meetings on
secular campuses
certainly meets with my approval. Secondly, the suggestion that the Affiliation
should sponsor more books again meets with my enthusiastic approval, although
I do not think that we have solved the question of how to choose
which books.
There is one point though, over which I disagree with Professor Bube.
The implication
of some of the remarks is that the battle about evolution is over,
and Peter Berkhout
gives the impression that every responsible person believes now in evolution.
In answer to the first, I would like to say that the battle is not over. Each
generation is presented with athiestic mechanism and it needs to have
some books
which give alternatives. My medical colleague here on the mission field asked
me whether I had any information or books which I could give to his sons about
the problem of evolution, just two years ago. Last year when I was
home on furlough
many young people at the churches in which I spoke about the North
Africa Mission,
would ask me what I thought about evolution. Obviously they asked me because I
was a doctor, and therefore in their eyes a scientific man. Naturally we have
to define evolution in our talk and I think that the article by George B. Homer
was very good. He talked of speciation, phyletic and quantum evolution. Then he
made clear that the first two kinds do happen, butso far the third kind has not been demonstrated.
Doctor Harold Hartzler, who is getting a copy of this letter, will remember that
at the 1966 Annual Convention at North Park College, I made a motion
that we should
produce and publish a new book, which could fill the gap left by the
"Modern
Science and Christian Faith" which is now out of print. I
cemented my motion
with an infinitesimal gift of $25 but I would like to mention that the motion
was approved with much enthusiasm by those present at that particular meeting.
I know perfectly well that ten minute's enthusiasm does not get the
honk written.
But I still think that we must do it.
I would like to suggest, though, a new organization of the book, perhaps in the
following sequence. The first chapter should contain a summary of the Gospel,
presenting its meaning and then be filled out with some of the
geological material
agreeing with the New Testament, such as is found in the book-"Are the New
Testament documents reliable"-and other books. The second chapter should
he on archaeological proofs of the events of the Old Testament. The
third chapter
should be on the Prophecies and the statistical probabilities of
those prophecies
being fulfilled by luck. There was a book put out by the Moody Press
in paperback
which had much of this information. I gave it away to somebody and I have never
been able to get another copy. Maybe one of you would know it and be
able to tell
me the name so that I could order some more. A fourth chapter might
be by a sociologist,
or a psychologist, about conversion experiences in religion and how they have
really changed people, with some testimonies both from America and
from the mission
field. Then the next chapter should be a philosophical type of
discussion perhaps,
in which the point is clearly made that because of all these facts, we consider
the Bible to be reliable data and any theory of the formation of the world, or
the development of man must agree with the data in this book. While I
do not agree
with Peter Berkhout's seeming capitulation to the word "evolution" I
think that his stress on the Bible of nature would have a very real
place in such
a chapter, and certainly the point would want to be heavily made that
if a fact
is found to be true in nature, it is just as true as a fact in the Bible, and
that we must then see whether the Bible needs further interpretation. Then to
have chapters on the formation of the Solar system, the age of man,
etc. Homer's
article seems to me to be quite acceptable as it stands, although he might wish
to make it somewhat longer. I always thought that the chapter on
"Mutations,
Genetics, and Heredity" in the book "Modern Science and
Christian Faith"
was one of the best chapters in the book. As far as my information is concerned
I would understand that most of this material is still valid, but in any case,
a chapter of this nature. Perhaps one should have a chapter by a
person, who believes
in cataclysmic geology. One of the chapters must deal
straightforwardly with the
fact that these new ages for man can not be reconciled with the First chapter
of Genesis as they stand. And the chapter should bring out the
possibilities that
have been presented in several of the articles in the journal. One
was that Adam
was the first man that could speak, then he went out and intermarried with the
sons of men.
Obviously we should not print a book which claims that we have all the answers
when we don't have them, but a book is urgently needed, which gives the great
amount of evidence to support a Creator, Who loves us and has rules and a life
for us. It may even be that there should be a chapter which discuses D.N.A., and
the new experiments concerning life. The articles that are published are always
written as though putting a little methane and other things together
and running
electricity through them, and then coming out with amino-acids proves
how everything
just happened by itself. But it always seems to me that it proves that the plan
to make life and amino-acids must even be built right into the atomic
structure.
Again in evidence for the Creator. Obviously this is philosophizing
but a little
philosophizing on our side never hurt. I hope that we will yet get a book out
of all this.