Science in Christian Perspective
EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE FORMATION OF SPECIES WITHIN THE PLANT KINGDOM
Dr. 0.
J. Eigsti
Plant
Geneticist,
Funk Hybrid Seed Company,
Bloomington, Illinois
Geneticists constantly seek a better understanding of those phenomena basic to
heredity and variations that is to say., the resemblances and differences
between and among individuals. As a result of an honest search for truth.,
tremendous amounts of factual evidence have accumulated. Today, all educators
must instruct within the sphere of these and other data., if we are to meet the
need of young people eager for more knowledge about the world in which we exist.
Anyone can demonstratereadily the reality of variation among plants and animals,
Such variation may be discontinuous and significant from the standpoint of
phylogenetic relationship. A child at the zoo finds little difficulty
distinguishing between the pet pussy cat FELIX DOMTICA and the fierce lion FEIX
LWO One may say these kinds of cats represent two clusters of individuals, thus
any lion is different from any pussy cat. Moreover each species forms a
visibly distinct group. Finally. within each of the groups the pussy cat to a
certain child may mean one particular cat not only different from lions but all
other cats. The universality of these observations can be extended to living
plants and animals throughout the world. We are able to estimate, with
confidence in our judgement that more than a million species of
plants and
animals exist today as illustrated by such clusters as the lions and pussy cats.
Much argument and discussion may attend the placement of a species into
biological relationship with another. Theories have been postulated to explain
phylogenetie origin of species and pbylogeny generally. These theories have
touched off bitter controversies. Some of the basic causes of species formation
yet remain utterly mysterious. On the other hand, we have accumulated a fund of
knowledge about certain groups of plants that clearly point the way toward an
understanding of speciation within certain areas of the plant kingdom.
Karl Linnaeus, the great Swedish Botanist, devised our present system of
naming species. His concept of the origin of species was that of a creation by a
divine and direct act, After a time., he discovered that certain species of
plants were definitely the offspring of two other parental species which he had
previously named. Thereupon., he realized the necessity for a revision
of his concept of species-origin. Linnaeus did not, at the same times discard
deep religious belief in God and creation when he realized the need for revision
of his earlier opinion about origin of species. The facts of hybridizations
which in some cases accounts for the development of new clusters of individuals,
are inescapable, if one makes any serious study of genetics and cytology.
Gregor Mendel, an Austrian monks discovered the basic laws governing variability
and resemblances between parents and offspring. The rediscovery of Mendells laws
in 1900 marked the beginning of our present half century which we celebrated in
1950. He followed certain characteristics of the garden peas from generation to
generation and formulated genetics laws which have had a profound influence upon
thinking in many of the biological s ciences. We may illustrate the impact of
Linnaeus and Mendelian concepts in the following case. Datura stramonium the Jimson
weed is a good Linnaean species, well known to many as an objectionable weed
in field and pasture. This species is characterized visibly by purple flowers,
purple stem and spiny capsules. Another species Datura tatula, the white
flowered Jimson weed, has green stems and is visibly distinct from the
purple Datura. According to Linnaeus early concept the two species
represented separate creations. Now the application of Mendelian laws gives us
now insights because the hybrid of a yellow flowered plant., D. tatula with a
purple flowered plant D. stramonium, always yields all purple-flowered plants.
If we self fertilize these purple hybrids the offspring may be both
yellow-flowered and purple-flowered plants. The differences are associated with
different genes at certain loci on certain chromosomes. Then the basis
for speciation, is found in the gene changes or mutations that occur and are
transmitted from one generation to another.
Within the last 25 years we have demonstrated that gene and chromosome-diversity
(mutations) can be induced by physical and chemical agents, i.e. x-ray and
colchicine, respectively. The consequences of these studies have direct bearing
on our present knowledge of species formation.
In the spring of 1937, experiments conducted at the Carnegie Institution
Department of Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor) Long Island., New York, proved that
a drug called to accumulate within individual cells. New
tissues arose from the treatment wherein cells carried a duplicated number of
chromosomes. Onion root tips regularly have 16 chromosomes'per cell, but the
colchicine-treated root tips showed cell conditions with 32 and 64 chromosomes,
and in some cases, cells bad 500 chromosomes per nucleus. When the drug is
applied to young seedlings, a new type of plant with double the number of
chromosomes may be obtained, These behave differently from the original
untreated plants. These are called polyploid plants. Among flowering plant
species over 50% known for chromosome number belong to the category of
polyploids and undoubtedly arose tn nature by some kind of doubling of the
chromosomes before or after specific hybridizations.
Further experimenting with colchicine revealed that a sterile species-hybrid
when doubled became fertile and as such became a reproducing unit or population
that ad not previously exist. We may illustrate these principles by the
following actual experiment carried out by two different scientists,,
independently two species of cotton, asiatic diploid, G-arboreum, a 26
chromosome species crossed by another American diploid, G.-thurbegri,also with
26 chromosomes, yields a sterile hybrid (G. arboreum x G. thurberi) cells
of the hybrid have 26 chromosomes and no flowers of such plants set seed. When
colchicine it applied to growing stem tips, new tissues develop that have cells
with 52 chromosomes. Now, these new tissues produce flowers that set seed.
Furthermore., one may also use these fertile flowers for crosses with standard varieties
of American cultivated cotton G-hirsutum., a 52 chromosome
species, The species-hybrid (G. arboreum and G. thurberi polyploid). and American
cultivated cotton may be crossed without difficulty. We may say that a synthetic
species G.-hirsutum synthetic is thus created. Hence we may obtain by
experimental procedures a synthetic species that simulates a
Linnaean species and theoretically recognized by Botanists as a reproduction of that
found in nature. Time does not permit to review many other documented cases
of genetic experiments which have led to the production of synthetic species
very similar to those formed in nature. Such origin of species in nature is
postulated as the "cataclysmic origin" of new species. Many crop
plants of economic importance are ploypolid, and fit a similar pattern
as for cotton. Not all speciation has occurred-in this manner but these
illustrations are excellent and are scientifically documented. We may
go a step farther and hybridize a radish with a cabbage. The hybrid is, as to be
expected, sterile, but by duplication of the chromosomes with colchicine, a fertile radish-cabbage plant may be obtained. We
must assign the name Raphano-brassica to this creation. Agan (wheat X
rye) hybrids can be doubled and from such experiment arises the Triticale or a
new wheat-rye hybrid different from either wheat or rye. Numerous additional
cases are being studied so that hybrids made fertile with colchicine are of
common occurrence. To date, 165 synthetic species have been made with cololdoine.
The mechanisms which operate in nature to establish species are complex and
outside the sphere of our limited time. Nevertheless geographic isolation,
ecological, and physiological factors play a very fundamental role in
speciation in nature.
Our problem now becomes one of orientation of this newer knowledge with Biblical
records that describe the origin of living plants and animals. When we
use the word creation we are not replacing the Scriptural teaching by present
scientific laws. The basic genetic mechanism and the gene complex or origin of genes remain as that which was created. We have merely enlarged our concept
of how different plants or individuals come into being once the basic gene
system was derived.
Summarizing the area covered in this discussion, we have shown how new
species of plants may arise by hybridization and subsequent doubling of
chromosomes to form new reproductive units. These fit the status of a new
species. Our interpretation of Biblical accounts of the origin of plants and
animals must take into consideration the accumulated factu4l evidence provided
by genetic investigation., if we are to make effective presentations to students
entering the field of biology.
There is no conflict between the genetic evidence at hand and Biblical
records. Organic diversity is clearly stated in the Bible and organic
diversity is observable. Organic similarities are outlined in the text of
Scriptures and these are explained from careful genetic investigation. The
explanation of speciation appears sound as viewed from the vantage points of
science and religion. I trust that this brief survey can be used for better
understanding by those earnestly seeking to continue sincere religious belief
and also pursue scientific investigations dealing with the controversial
biological materials of phylogeny and phylogenetic relationships.