See a detailed list of "Early Humans".
We thank Ashley, a student at the Kent School
for directing us to
this site.
Creation and Evolution Updated:6/15/15 |
||
Home
_____________ "The Biblical doctrine of
creation is one of the richest doctrines revealed to us by God.
It is because of creation that we know that the universe and everything
in it depends moment-by-moment upon the sustaining power and activity of
God.
It is because of creation that we know that we are not the end-products
of meaningless processes in an impersonal universe, but men and women
made in the image of a personal God. It is by the formulation of
"creation out of nothing" that we affirm that God created the universe
freely and separately, and reject the alternatives of dualism and
pantheism.
To worship God as Creator is to emphasize both His transcendence
over the natural order and His imminence in the natural order; it is to
recognize that His mode of existence as Creator is completely other than
our mode of existence as created.
To appreciate God as
Creator is to recognize that which He created as intrinsically good; the
rationale for scientific investigation, the assurance of ultimate
personal meaning in life, and the nature of evil as an aberration on a
good creation are all intrinsic to such an appreciation.
We believe in
creation. It is unthinkable for a Christian to do otherwise."
Richard Bube-1971 Darwin confided the
following to Harvard botanist Asa Gray in a letter of May 1860: "I had no intention to write atheistically….I can see no reason, why a man, or other animal, may not have been aboriginally produced by other laws; & that all these laws may have been expressly designed by an omniscient Creator, who foresaw every future event & consequence. But the more I think the more bewildered I become."-- I never knew the
newspapers were so profoundly interesting. North America does not do England
justice; I have not seen or heard of a soul who is not with the North.
Some few, and I am one of them, even wish to God, though at the loss of
millions of lives, that the North would proclaim a crusade against
slavery. In the long-run, a million horrid deaths would be amply repaid
in the cause of humanity. What wonderful times we live in! Massachusetts
seems to show noble enthusiasm. Great God! How I should like to see the
greatest curse on earth—slavery—abolished! The case for Cosmic
Ancestry is not yet proven, of course. At this point the best reason
to notice it is that the mainstream Darwinian paradigm does not
satisfactorily account for sustained evolutionary progress and the
origin of life on Earth. We will mention some of the flaws in the
Darwinian account, but our primary purpose is to present Cosmic
Ancestry as a viable, new scientific account of evolutionary
progress and the origin of life on Earth. Bloggers Coment! Science
False So Called August
2010 It's
"Only a Theory" Benjamin...
The fact is, evolution is a theory to explain numerous facts, not a
single fact to be tested in a laboratory. Christians often argue that
"evolution is only a theory, not a fact," as if it's some nebulous
philosophy. When we say those things, we completely embarrass ourselves.
Evolution is indeed "only a theory," BUT a theory is higher than a fact,
for a theory explains all the facts. We don't say that the theory of
gravity is "only a theory." The theory of gravity will never grow up
into a fact. All the creation scientists have to do is produce one fact
that does not fit within the theory of evolution, and the theory will be
changed or undone. In fact, science is a very competitive field, and you
only make a name for yourself by proving that something someone said
before you is wrong. Scientists would LOVE a verifiable test that can be
repeated in a laboratory that would fit outside the theory of evolution
so a newer, more comprehensive theory can take its place. In fact, I
believe someday that will come. Just as the theory of gravity was
subsumed into the far more encompassing theory of relativity, so the
theory of evolution will continue to be expanded to give us a clearer
picture of the workings of nature. But to call
it a mere philosophy that isn't falsifiable is misguided. All a creation
scientist has to do is head into laboratory with a primitive form of
bacteria and let these bacteria reproduce for a period of ten years. An
entire generation of bacteria live and die within about a 24 hour
period. Over a period of years, thousands of generations pass, giving us
a chance to observe evolution in a fast forward mode. All creation
scientists have to do is conduct this experiment and demonstrate that no
evolution has occurred. But in fact, scientists have already done this
with upwards of 30,000 generations of bacteria reproduction and have
seen repeatable and predictable evolutionary changes in the bacteria. In
fact, this happens with viruses, which is why we have to have a
different flu shot each year. We kill the viruses, but the mutated
generations live to evolve into a new strain. If you believe evolution
is a false philosophy, don't get your flu shot. But here's
where God screams out his name. Each time these bacteria tests have been
done, these bacteria evolve in nearly the same way each time. What this
demonstrates is that evolution is not "random," but directed. That shows
intelligence and purpose. Rewind the clock of time, refire the big bang,
and eventually, you'd have upright intelligent creatures that are fully
self-aware and capable of knowing and worshiping God. Evolution may
appear random on a micro scale, but the broader picture reveals purpose
and design. Unfortunately, we Christians have surrendered the territory
known as science and have left Dawkins and company to interpret the data
to a new generation of future atheists. We will answer for that someday. |
|
ASA Statements |
Biblical/Theological Papers
|
No topic in the world of 'science and Christianity' has fostered the intensity of discussion and disharmony with evangelicals as the source of biological diversity. The pages of Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith (PSCF) reflect the tensions for a community which claims to value both the Bible and science yet finds it difficult to forge a view on origins that takes in to account both areas of revelation. Various faith-science blogs debate the details and new discoveries with great gusto.
St Augustine offers this advice:
A June 2011 Christianity Today article "The Search for the Historical Adam" and a later web site editorial "No Adam, No Eve, No Gospel" drew much interest from evangelical publications, web pages, and bloggers of many persuasions. It described recent advances in genetics that suggested the need for reconsideration of the traditional Christian understanding of Adam and Eve. In short, well established genetic studies have concluded that humanity could not have begun with an initial human pair uniquely given souls by God; rather the complexity of the human genome required an original population of ~1,000.
While anti-evolution advocates sought to pick holes in the scientific picture, biblical scholars have sought to develop interpretations that join an evolutionary process with the biblical text. C. John Collins (Did Adam and Eve Really Exist? Crossway 2011) finds a contemporary population while Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam, What the Bible Does and Doesn't Say about Human Origins, Brazos Press (2012) sees Genesis as not directed to primarily provide objective historical and scientific information but to offer a statement of the story of nation of Israel within the context of Near East history.
Others treat the biblical text in a different way. However most feel the Augustinian picture to be persuasive. There is certainly much more at stake here than with earlier science-faith impasses in medicine or astronomy.
It is important that the reader review the basic themes of the
topics "About Science and Faith" and
"The Bible and Science." These sections will prepare you
for the challenges of Ancient Near East literature, the
enduring misunderstandings produced by erroneous readings of the Hebrew text,
claims that the Bible anticipates aspects of modern science,
translations biased by the influence of ancient philosophy, the
claims of modern statements on the inspiration and
inerrancy of the Bible, controversies over literal vs. symbolic readings
of early Genesis, and much more..
A Recent News Item: "A
4.4 million-year-old skeleton nicknamed “Ardi” by scientists who
Today's spirited discussion
often pits Christian vs. Christian and scientist vs. scientist when it
comes to points of interpretation. Public debates over education and the
"culture wars" keep the pot boiling. We offer creditable resources from
which the reader can draw his/her own position.
Harry L. Poe, "The English Bible and the Days of
Creation: When Tradition Conflicts with Text," PSCF
66, Sept. 2014: (130-139)
PDF
and Recent
polls that indicate the mood of the American public:
In U.S., 46% Hold Creationist View of Human Origins: Highly religious Americans most likely to believe in creationismPRINCETON, NJ -- Forty-six percent of Americans believe in the
creationist view that God created humans in their present form at
one time within the last 10,000 years. The prevalence of this
creationist view of the origin of humans is essentially unchanged
from 30 years ago, when Gallup first asked the question. About a
third of Americans believe that humans evolved, but with God's
guidance; 15% say humans evolved, but that God had no part in the
process.
more
Joe E Martin, "
Compatibility of Major U.S. Christian Denominations with Evolution, ************************************ Sixty+ years of ASA publications reflect the paths that English speaking
evangelicals have
A Spectrum of Creation Views
held by Evangelicals All Christians in the sciences affirm the central role of the Logos in creating
and maintaining the universe. In seeking to describe how the incredible universe
has come to be, a variety of views has emerged in the last two hundred years
as
continuing biblical and scientific scholarship have enabled deeper
understanding
of God's word and world.
Challenges to the church via cultural issues have had
their effects on faith
science thinking.
The Evangelical Spectrum:
Apparent Old Creation: The universe is recent as recorded in the Bible but created to look old as found by scientific studies. Al Mohler
Old-earth
progressive creation:
God's direct role in creation as
consisting of separate
Evolving Creation (Theistic Evolution):
God's
activity is typically progressive in time, and
One Time
Creation:
God has created a universe which depends
continually upon God, but
We provide a series of papers and books that emphasize various aspects
of biological origins. They
are
arranged
under the categories of Historical,
Scientific, and
Biblical/Theolo
Then follows
a friendly exchange in PSCF
on
evolutionary psychology. An earlier dialogue
Theistic Evolution offers
a shorter
introduction. Younger surfers should check-out
Fish Wars.
Non-coding half of human genome unlocked with novel sequencing
technique Recent News: Texas A&M University biology doctoral student John C. Aldrich (left), working with associate professor of biology Dr. Keith A. Maggert (right), has developed an inexpensive, fluorescent-dye-based sequencing technique to monitor DNA-related dyanmics in heterochromatin -- a game-changing discovery that lays the groundwork to study the non-coding half of the human genome.
October 7, 2014
UF researchers include humans in most comprehensive tree of life to date
Filed under on
Thursday, February 7, 2013.
GAINESVILLE, Fla. — An international team of scientists including University of Florida researchers has generated the most comprehensive tree of life to date on placental mammals, which are those bearing live young, including bats, rodents, whales and humans. Appearing Thursday in the journal Science, the study details how researchers used both genetic and physical traits to reconstruct the common ancestor of placental mammals, the creature that gave rise to many mammals alive today. The data show that contrary to a commonly held theory, the group diversified after the extinction of dinosaurs 65 million years ago. The research may help scientists better understand how mammals survived past climate change and how they may be impacted by future environmental conditions.
A Biologos video which address the age question. 17 min. (2012)
Thomas Wynn, " Into the mind of a Neanderthal" New Scientist 18 January 2012What would have made them laugh? Or cry? Did they love home more than we do? Meet the real Neanderthals. A NEANDERTHAL walks into a bar and says... well, not a lot, probably. Certainly he or she could never have delivered a full-blown joke of the type modern humans would recognize because a joke hinges on surprise juxtapositions of unexpected or impossible events. Cognitively, it requires quite an advanced theory of mind to put oneself in the position of one or more of the actors in that joke - and enough working memory (the ability to actively hold information in your mind and use it in various ways). more...
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent Douglas Theobald, Ph.D. Version 2.89 2012Introduction: Evolution, the overarching concept that unifies the biological sciences, in fact embraces a plurality of theories and hypotheses. In evolutionary debates one is apt to hear evolution roughly parceled between the terms "microevolution" and "macroevolution". Microevolution, or change beneath the species level, may be thought of as relatively small scale change in the functional and genetic constituencies of populations of organisms. That this occurs and has been observed is generally undisputed by critics of evolution. What is vigorously challenged, however, is macroevolution. Macroevolution is evolution on the "grand scale" resulting in the origin of higher taxa. In evolutionary theory, macroevolution involves common ancestry, descent with modification, speciation, the genealogical relatedness of all life, transformation of species, and large scale functional and structural changes of populations through time, all at or above the species level (Freeman and Herron 2004; Futuyma 1998; Ridley 1993).from t.o archives.
This PBS resource is a good startingpoint
The Theological Dilemma of Evolution
In this Biologos series, Gordon J. Glover examines both sides
to the evolution controversy as it relates to the Bible.
He asserts that whether evolution is true or false, it creates
theological problems. Therefore, it is necessary for pastors,
seminary professors, and theologians to seriously consider the facts and
facilitate honest discussion about the issues
at hand.
Discovering the tree of
Life
Video (10 min.) Yale University Peabody Museum of Natural History
*************************************************
"Genesis
and the Genome: Genomics
Evidence for Human-Ape Common Ancestry and Ancestral Hominid Population Sizes,"
Dennis R. Venema
Richard H. Bube, "We Believe in Creation," Journal of the American Scientific Affiliation (PSCF), 23 (June 1971):121-122.
ASA
Executive Council, "A
Voice For Evolution as Science," PSCF, 44 (December 1992): 252.
ASA Creation Commission Statement (August 2000)
Historical Papers
Hiram
Caton,
Getting Our History Right: Six Errors about Darwin and His Influence
www.epijournal.net 5(1) 2007: 52-69.
James Moore ,
Evolution and Wonder : Understanding Charles Darwin (July
20,2006) on
Charles Darwin’s view of religion,
adaptation, and creation. Audio interview
Lectures Dennis Lamoureux, "Beyond the Evolution - Creation Debate" (2003)
Scientific
Papers
David
Lathi,
"Looking
to the Birds: A Perspective on the Interpretation of Nature,"
John Bracht,
Natural Selection as an Algorithm: Why Darwinian Processes Lack the
Glenn R.
Morton,
"Transitional
Forms and the Evolution of Phyla," PSCF
53.1
(March 2001):
Ronald G.
Larson,
"Viral Evolution:
Climbing Mount Molehill?" PSCF 52 (September
2000): Lahti,
David,
Evolutionary Theory Misunderstood PSCF 52.3:215-217 (9/2000). Armin Held, & Peter Rust,"Genesis
Reconsidered" PSCF 51.4:231-243 (12/1999).
Gordon C.
Mills, "A
Design Theory of Progressive Creation." A series of five papers
George L.
Murphy, "Chiasmic
Cosmology and Creation's Functional Integrity, "PSCF
53
One of the first to carry out a controlled evolution experiment was
the Rev.
William H. Dallinger, a
minister in the English Wesleyan Methodist Church. A talented and
persistent amateur
scientist, he was the first to
study the complete life cycle of unicellular organisms under the
microscope and
the adaptation of such
organisms to changes in temperature. He cultivated small unicellular
organisms in a custom-built
incubator over a time period of seven years
(1880-1886). Dallinger slowly increased the temperature
of the incubator
from an initial 60 °F up to 158 °F. The early cultures had shown clear
signs of distress
at a temperature of 73 °F, and were certainly not
capable of surviving at 158 °F. The organisms
Dallinger had in his
incubator at the end of the experiment, on the other hand, were
viable at
158 °F. However, these organisms would not grow
anymore at the initial 60 °F. He concluded that
this was was clear evidence for Darwinian adaptation, and that the
organisms had adapted to live in a
high-temperature environment.
Unfortunately, Dallinger's incubator was accidentally destroyed in 1886,
and he was unable to continue this line of research. His approach was followed by numerous
workers in the early 20th Century.
--JWH
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/humans/index.html
General Books
SAVING DARWIN: How to Be a
Christian and Believe in Evolution by Karl W. Giberson.
New
York: HarperOne, 2008. 248 pages, notes, index. Hardcover; $24.95. I ONLY A THEORY: Evolution and the
Battle for America’s Soul by Kenneth R. Miller.
THANK GOD FOR EVOLUTION: How the
Marriage of Science and Religion Will Transform
Your Life and Our World
by Michael Dowd. New York: Viking Adult, 2008.
413 pages, EVOLUTIONARY CREATION: A
Christian Approach to Evolution by Denis O. Lamoureux.
Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2008. 493 pages, appendices, notes,
glossary, index.
Paperback; $55.00. ISBN: 1556355815.
Keith
B. Miller, editor; Perspectives on an Evolving Creation 2003
Eerdmans.
ebooks:
(free)
Evangelicals, Evolution, and Academics (2008) A series of
short articles by Steve Martin, Keith Miller,
Dennis Verema, Steve Matheson,
Karl
Giberson, Gordon Glover, Douglas Hayworth, and Ted Davis; edited by
Steve Martin. Ebook and Index for the Student Perspective Series (2009) 1. Introduction (Steve Martin) 2. My journey from opposing evolution to studying it (Ryan Bebej) 3. An evolutionary biology student discovers Christ ... and the toxic anti-evolutionism that often taints the Gospel (Emiliano Carneiro Monteiro) 4. My transition from a conservative creationist to a theistic evolutionist - albeit with some unanswered questions (Eric DeVries) 5. Clarifying concepts in the creation-evolution dialogue (Jordan Mallon) 6. Avoiding the topic of Evolution in Christian academia: Reflections from a theologystudent (Bethany Sollereder)
Marlowe C. Embree,
The Social Psychology of the Origins
Debate (2008) An
Charles Darwin (1838-41)
The Voyage of the Beagle
Reference Works
Frederick Gregory, Nature Lost?
Natural Science and the German Theological Traditions
Ronald L. Numbers.
The Creationists.
New York: Alfred Knopf, 1992.
Americans remain "a
spectacularly religious" people..as long as this is the case...there
will be an intense
discussion about origins. Science permeates all of
American society from top to bottom.
The rub
comes where
the scientific elite wields its cultural dominance
irresponsibly and carelessly identifies "scientific knowledge of
origins" with an "exhaustive knowledge or understanding of origins" and
thereby dismisses religious views as
"primitive and therefore false." Religious groups have a responsibility to appreciate that this is
an advanced
scientific culture and deal with the tough issues that come
up. ...the origins debate in America will not go away. |