Science in Christian Perspective
Letters to the Editor
Responses to "Is There a Christian Basis for a Sexual
Revolution?" (Journal ASA, June 1974)
AlanHarder FrankVosler Joseph P. Paydon Lloyd L. Rheinheimer Thaoias R. Teply Mark Peterson
From: JASA 27
(March 1975): 46-47.
Alan Harder
The best perspective on proper hermeneutics ties somewhere between
Bube and Roy.
On the one hand, there are biblical and extra-biblical criteria for determining
what is a just or loving or gracious action. These criteria are quite
inter-subjective
and knowable and their systematization results in biblical and
extrabiblical laws.
This is very close to the emphasis of Bribe. But some of the criteria can and
do change with time and space and conditions, and therefore the form
and content
of the laws based upon them change, too. This is why many of the prescriptions
of the Old Testament have lapsed into desuetude. There is no theological or any
other kind of objection to this type of irrelevance. This, I take it, is very
close to what Roy says.
Allen Harder Department of Philosophy Iowa State University Allies,
Iowa 50010
Rustom Roy's pitch for sexual liberty and situation ethics shows
how
clever the
human mind can be in rationalizing its desires when its tether is loosed from
the Word of God. His questioning Of the interpretation or revelance of certain
passages can be 'summarized in the words of his mentor, ''Yea, w hat hath
God said?" He apparently has read the book of Galations: I suggest that he read
Jude next.
The window opening to the left - the enmeshing dialog with the apostates will
blind us to the handwriting on the wall.
Frank Vosler 8011 Morse Rd. New Albany, Ohio 43054
Joseph P. Paydon
What a brave attempt in "Is there a Christian Basis for a Sexual
Revolution?"
and what a pathetic waste of space.
In Roy's words, "is not the pre-occupation with sex instead of love wholly
a waste of time and energy for Christians today" But why then does he occupy
himself with questionable analogies, twisted injunctions, and pure
self-contradictions
to establish his position on SE X? Isn't this just the plain
centuries-old process
of self-justification we all like to find for ourselves "lien out of tune
with God?
And as far Bube, what he writes is for time most part excellent, except it
has that quality - rather like pulling one's punches - so that when he
has finished he has seemed to have not done justice to his arguments, and the
remarks rather
fall flat. Is this perhaps because the entire subject ought not to have been
"How a Christian sex life should appear" - but "How, really,
does a Christian meet God's desires of LOVE, and of what does a life IN Christ
really consist?"
Joseph P. Paydon Department of Mathematics U.S. Naval Academy
Annapolis, MD 21401
Lloyd L. Rheinheimer
as a Christian believer was appalled that we are even permitting such
a dialogue
in our Christian journals such as Dr. Roy proposed. I roil sore that
tie and others
who believe with turn in his proposals have man) arg onien ts that they would
throw at me to validate their position. t am not capable at going into all the
sociologic arguments that the proponents of liberation to sexuality
put forward.
However as a practicing physician and a Christian I can testify clearly to the
wisdom of God regarding the sanctity of marriage and conversely to the terrible
results of people who will not accept God's direction for human beings in the
area of marriage and sexuality.
I would hope that the A.S.A. would not pursue obvious anti and n
on-Christian avenues
of discussion. There is much more that should be done in this field
without seemingly
accepting un-Christian ethics.
Lloyd L. Rheinheimer, M.D. Box 128 Milford, Indiana 46542
Thaoias R. Teply
I believe it is extremely significant. and 1 trust more than coincidental, that
the June 1974 issue of the Journal began with an article which at least touched
on the large subject of biblical interpretation, while the last
article consisted
of your dialogue with Rustum Roy on the issue of the sexual revolution.
My reaction to the dialogue was that Roy is almost totally
illiterate in the field of hermeneutics. In my ministry I have
discovered that most people including good church-goers--are caught
in the same
difficulty. Either conscious or unconscious blind rejection of' the simple and
near meaning of a Scripture passage in favor at ss hat I want it to
say is called
''my interpretation." This is the only way in which such
absurd propositions
as Roy's can even be considered in the context of' the Christian
faith today.
Thaoias R. Teply, First Presbyterian Church Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Mark Peterson
I appreciated Roy's willingness to air his views in response to
Bribe's critique,
and that appreciation increased as I saw the diversity of their
positions. Nevertheless.
1 found myself, reacting negatively to Roy's views on very basic issues.
Rostorn Roy's "highly selected quotations" on lass vs. grace distort
the nature of grace. Even in Gal. 5 the works at the flesh are
described as evident,
not shrouded in subjective ambiguities. Sexual sins are held in sorry contrast
to the love-fruit of the Spirit.
To regard fulfillment of sexual desire a necessity goes beyond the teaching of
our Lord. Food and clothing are the only physical basics that Jesus accepts as
needs in his Sermon on the Mount.
"Sexual affluence''. Roy's favorite catch-term, is also misleading.
Technological
accessories not with-standing. since the Creator has supplied the same basic
equipment to every generation. Stolen sex is as old as the thief but Honest
Sex is a deductive rip-oft. And squandered sex is never affluence,
just inflation.
That large segments of the church of Jesus Christ will be
increasingly conformed
to the world in sexual mores is a saddening probability. That it
should intentionally
he led this way of Balaam is nonsense. The last state would be worse than the
first.
Is there a Christian basis for a sexual revolution? No, but it would
take a Balaam's
cure to restrain the madness of these prophets.
Mark Peterson 328 N. Palm St. Janesville, Wisconsin 53545