Science
in Christian Perspective
Letter to the Editor
Population Control
W. Jim Neidhardt
Department of Physics
Newark College of Engineering
Newark, New Jersey 07102
From: JASA 26 (September 1974): 132-133.
There has been much useful work in recent years attempting to a)
predict the rate
of future population growth and b) the impact of such growth on the quality of
human existence. Such predictive attempts usually assume somewhat deterministic
models of man's behavior patterns. Man is seldom viewed as a responsible, whole
person capable of rising beyond the "machine" level of
existence. Indeed,
capable of making genuine free choices that will enable him to alter and adapt
his environment in a manner that clearly respects and attempts to preserve the
intrinsic goodness inherent in all of God's creation: other men,
beasts, forests,
plants, even inert rocks. Practically all such predictive models of the future
assume as the central criteria for success the survival of the human
species (with
perhaps some measure of material comfort). Almost never, even by
Christians (excepting
F. Sehaeffer), is man's attempt to come to grips with his environment
viewed from
God's "eyes." This man-centered perspective that we adopt may blind
us to possible hidden dangers in uncontrolled population growth. The following
thoughts are accordingly directed toward this question: Are there
hidden dangers
inherent in uncontrolled population growth?
1. It may well be possible to truly feed an expanding world
population in a nutritionally
sound way. Much can be done to utilize presently untapped food
resources and eliminate
such inefficient food sources as cattle grazing on large land
areas. We may have to learn to enjoy the taste of soy beans as much as that of
beef. But, I believe that mankind (even Western man) is capable of
this effort.
2. It may even he possible to supply an expanding world population's
energy needs
by utilization of yet untapped sources of energy. It is within the
realm of finite
probability that controlled thermo-nuclear fusion and/or the
development of practical
supercooductiog materials above liquid nitrogen temperatures may he
possible before
2000 AD. Either of these two possibilities would improve the world's
energy producing
capacity by orders of magnitude. There may not even be appreciable
pollution side
effects associated with these two very different possible new sources of energy
and energy transport. There is much that still can be done with
respect to finding
new sources of energy and conserving existing resources; it is at least in the
realm of possibility that an expanding world population may be able to find the
means to meet its energy needs.
3. The capability of uncontrolled population growth filling all
available living
space is the possible hidden danger. For in doing so the living area
of humanity
will become so cramped that individual privacy is no longer possible and man's
living environment will become entirely artificial, i.e., man made.
Even in purely inanimate many-body interacting systems, crowding, due
to an excess
number in a given space, leads to qualitatively new behavior
frequently destructive
to the original system. When radioactive elements exceed a critical
mass, nuclear
fisson results; when a gas of interacting particles is sufficiently
dense, transition
to a new state of matter, the liquid state, is observed. Similar
behavior is observed
for living interacting systems, plant, animal, and human. Crowding
often results
in a whole species dying out due to adverse interactions with the activity of
other populations once a critical crowding level is reached. Even at the level
of human encounter, excessive crowding, with its resulting loss of
privacy, becomes
destructive to physical, mental, and spiritual well-being as the testimony of
the daily rides of a crowded subway will easily confirm.
But, on a far deeper level, man is made in the image of a personal God who has
made him so live in harmony with a created, physical order that is
distinct from,
but nevertheless bears the mark of God's creative personality as He continually
holds it in being. If man, by allowing uncontrolled population growth to lead
to excessive crowding, becomes completely immersed in an artificial, man-made
environment he thereby loses a vital contact with the God who made
him. For this
new, artificial environment reflects hack upon man far too much of
his own selfish
ego. I am afraid, among other undedesirable features, such an environment will
impose upon modern man the far too hectic pace and random chatter
associated with
the "busyness" of our get ahead at the others expense,
selfish society.
Man needs for his spiritual well-being time for reflective
contemplation, immersed
in an environment relatively untouched by human activity showing
fully the majesty
of a complex, interacting harmonious system that bears the mark of
God's personal
creativity. Is it not significant that David, Jesus, and Paul all withdrew from
continual human encounter to a wilderness area, to pray, to rest, and
renew their
vital contact with the Living God, their Loving Father? Man encounters God in
the love shown him by other fellow image bearers of God, but man's
God-given nature
also requires contemplative encounter with God through experiencing the beauty,
majesty, and order present in that part of God's Creation untouched
by man. Christians
must strive to help the world meet its material needs or we are
indeed hypocrites,
but man does not live by bread alone. To allow population growth to stamp all
of God's Creation with man-made structure is to wipe out a vital
channel of communication
with God, contemplative communion with God in a part of His
environment untouched
by human selfishness and pride. For in such places man can regain his ability
to reflect upon his relation to God and to weigh carefully the alternatives in
the difficult decisions life thrusts upon him. It is a strange paradox that man
in order to prevent himself acting like only an animal must seek contemplative
access to sheltered areas where animals live in relationship primarily to one
another. The world still needs to pay heed to St. Francis's insight
that God truly
loves men but animals also; after all, He created them all.
4. I am in basic accord with those organizations that, recognizing the dangers
of uncontrolled growth, attempt to motivate mankind to alter its
child-producing
patterns. Such motivation attempts should clearly point out the dangers of
Population crowding to the individual (in cultural context) as a whole person,
not just to his or her material well-being. It should treat individuals in all
cultures as capable of responsible choice and thereby attempt an
educational approach
that will meaningfully communicate to diverse populations the dangers of excess
population. Man is both "brute and angel;" when he is respected as an
individual be might just make the right choice in sufficient numbers
to stem the
population tide. God still works in human history. All volunteer
methods of controlling
population growth should be exhausted before any legal sanction against giving
birth is put into force. And it is my view that any such legal sanctions should
limit themselves to additional taxes, etc. Compulsory sterilization sounds tar
ton much like Nazi Germany and ignores that only God is a true prophet of the
future. Such sterilization on a worldwide scale might even lead to
eventual dangers
of under population.