Science in Christian Perspective
Literature on Glossolalia
WATSON E. MILLS
Department of Philosophy and Religion
Averett College Danville, Virginia 24541
From: JASA 26
(December 1974): 169-173.
Comparatively, there is little material available on glossolalia although the
amount of literature has increased drastically since April 3, 1960,
the date usually
regarded as marking the "new-pentetration" of tonguespeech into the
mainline denominations. Prior to 1950 there were only a handful of
studies available,
and some of these were not accessible to English readers. 28,35,46 Generally,
the literature reflects a lack of clarity on several fronts,
especially regarding
definition. Moreover, much of the writing is characterized by a
highly prejudicial
viewpoint with respect to the usefulness of the phenomenon. Thus the
description
of what is happening is frequently lost in the attempt to either
justify the experience
or consign its adherents to the sphere of the demonic.
The reader who is not at all familiar with the tongues phenomenon would do well
to look at some general introduction to the subject for orientation
and reference.
The volume by Anthony Hoekema20 or that by Larry Christenson6
would be found
inclusive though non-technical. In addition, there are numerous
popularly written
articles that are nonetheless accurate,64,65.66,71 although many of
the so-called
"secular" magazines present the phenomenon in a rather
negative light89-92
A volume appearing too late to he included in the references below is Speaking
in Tongues: Let's Talk About it, edited by Watson E. Mills (Word,
1973). The book
contains ten essays by leading authorities in the subject. The foreword is by
Martin Marty.
The literature on glossolalia falls into one of several categories. Since the
purpose of this essay is basically bibliographic, an attempt will be
made to indicate
something of the nature and usefulness of the various materials included in the
bibliography proper.
Primary Materials
The reference to tongues in Acts and I Corinthians exhaust the direct instances
of the phenomenon in the biblical record. The reference in Mark
16:1.7 is interesting but there is no reason to include this spurious text among the primary
ones, a conclusion reached by virtually all scholars including Pentecostals.69
The Old Testament background is important and can be approached in
terms of prophetic ecstaticism.17,27 Extra-biblical references bearing on glossolalia
have been examined
by Stuart Currie,54 and Ira Martin30,62 has assembled some of the tests
that could be regarded as glossolalic in nature. The church fathers
provide several
references to the phenomenon.106,114 These are discussed thoroughly in
Kenneth Bruce Welliver.98
There are numerous sources for obtaining transliterated samples of
tongue speech.
7,16,40 These examples are worthy of careful study and evaluation,
Reference Materials
Probably the earliest published bibliography in English on glossolalia appeared
over two decades ago.70 In 1970 Ira Martin produced a bibliography
that contained
678 entries.31 The latter is virtually definitive except for some obscure
periodical articles and privately printed materials. While some
attention is given
to foreign works, the list is basically English. A more recent list
by this writer
includes contemporary writings as well.50 These can be supplemented
with the extensive
bibliographies found in recent hooks on tongues. 22,23,25,33,40
Only recently, David W. Faupel compiled a bibliography of the
American Pentecostal movement.48 It does not refer to any works on tongues not already alluded to in
the lists cited above, although it does treat other areas of Pentecostalism in
much greater detail than existing bibliographies.
There are numerous dictionary 79,84,86 and encyclopedia articles78,80,81,88
that can be consulted with profit. Of particular interest are the articles by
Elias Andrews 73-75 in the Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible. Additional
reference materials can be found in Kittel,77 Bauer,76 and other
lexicons72,85,87
and lexical aids .82,83
Historical Studies
For years the standard treatment of the history of glossolalia has been that of
George Barton Cutten.7 It is an objective and inclusive account of
the occurrences
of tongues throughout the history of the church. The work is frequently cited
in more recent attempts to trace the movement. Certainly, Cutten's work is more
"historical" than "psychological" although he did
anticipate
this latter dimension that is presently receiving considerable attention.
The Pentecostals themselves offer the reader many histories; however,
glossolalia
is often given only cursory attention since it is but one facet in the broader
context of Pentecostal studies.
Among the many works of Donald Gee, a good example of his history
writing abilities
may be seen in The Pentecostal Movement.13 Another Pentecostal
effort is that
of Frank Ewart,9 and still more recently the historian Vinson Syrian
has treated
Pentecostalism in America.44 These writers do basically what Cutten did though
they are not quite so detached as he.
Stanley H. Frodsham has written an excellent work that treats not
only the history
of glossolalia and its present-day occurrences in America, but also in Chile,
West Africa, China and Egypt.11
Pentecostalism in its larger context is the subject of a recently
translated German
volume by Walter Hollenweger.21 This massive tome is the most
definitive statement
of modern Pentecostalism. It contains a wealth of information about
events, leaders
and beliefs. The historical section is obviously selective and is not
so comprehensive
as Nils Bloch-Hoell4 or John T. Nichol.36 All of these volumes pay considerable
attention to glossolalia though this is always done within the
broader framework.
Sociocultural Studies
Enthusiastic, ecstatic possession and other similiar phenomena have
long intrigued
anthropologists. There have been a number of cross-cultural studies
of ethnographic
data on glossolalia. Carlyle L. May63 did a survey of glossolalia and related
phenomena in nonChristian religions. He found the roots of the phenomenon to be
in the ancient religions of Asia Minor. He further concluded that glossolalia
and kindred phenomena are confined to those areas where spirit
possession is found.
Erika Bourguignon has done studies on the larger question of religion in native
societies.47 She notes a variety of forms of glossolaba among the primitives.
In some cases the practice was part of a fabric that included trances and the
like; other times tongue speech occurred as isolated behavior. Her
student, Felicitas
D. Goodman, recently published a monograph16 that follows a similar tack. Her
cross-cultural study essentially views glossolalia as aberrant
behavior. The glossolalist
modifies his speech into a certain pattern because he is in a mental state that
approximates a trance. Glossolalia then becomes an artifact of a hyperaroused
mental state.
BA. Knox studied the occurrences of glossolalia in the eighteenth and
nineteenth
centuries.24 Looking at traditional Christian groups he
discovered that tongue
speech is aimed at reestablishing an experimental basis for religious faith-a
dimension that had been replaced by intellectualism. He concluded
that glossolalia was a proof of the presence of God in the believer's life, a
view that has
been advanced to explain the references to tongues in Acts.33
In some studies prior to 1960, the attempt was made to relate
glossolalia to Pentecostal
and Holiness groups. These groups were usually characterized by their marginal
socioeconomic position in society as well as by a lower degree of intellectual
sophistication. The various forms of ecstatic behavior, including
tongues, served
both as an outlet for repressed conflicts and as a means of demonstrating that
regardless of one's plight within society there is a certain degree
of righteousness available.26,53
But with the inroads of glossolalia into virtually every Protestant
denomination,
a newer position is to regard the phenomenon as a rite de passage93 since
the participants are neither marginal socially nor intellectually.
They do, however,
need to demonstrate significant hehavorial change.
Tongues and Other Traditions
The spread of glossolalia into the various denominations of Protestantism can
he traced in the various publications of the Full Gospel Business
Men's Fellowship
International. These include Voice101 and View 105 and numerous
others.99,100,102,103
Trinity, 104 the now defunct publication of the Blessed Trinity Society, is an
excellent source for testimonia.
It is difficult to evaluate the spread of neo-Penteeostalism into Catholicism
because it is so recent a development and there has not been
sufficient time for
a critical study to appear. There have been a number of helpful books,9,14,37
however, including two significant works by Dorothy and Kevin Ranaghan.38,39 These
authors estimate that 30,000 people may be involved in the spiritual
renewal within
Catholic ranks, Several articles by Kilian McDonnell59-61
are valuable
since he affords the reader an inside view of the emerging Catholic-Pentecostal
tradition.
As glossolalia began to crop up in the various mainline denominations the need
arose for some official pronouncement on the subject from the various
groups whose
lives were touched by it. The episcopal diocese of California issued the late
Bishop Pike a "preliminary report"94 in 1963. His "pastoral
letter"67 grew out of the findings of the twenty page report submitted by
a panel of nine persons.
Other official reports include those issued by study commissions of
the Lutheran95
and Presbyterian" churches.96
Psychological Studies
Since William James, students of religion have sought to explain most so-called
religious phenomena in terms of various psychological models. The practice of
speaking in tongues did not escape close scrutiny by those
disciplined in psychology
of religion. Cotten did not hesitate to postulate that glossolahia
could be "explained
by recognized psychological laws."7 Once established, the
"psychological"
dimension of glossolalia afforded those most opposed to the phenomenon another
way to disparage it. Some initial studies enabled the critics to
dismiss the one
who speaks in tongues as being pathological29 or engaging in some
kind of automatic speech.28 Eddison Mosimann35 likened glossolaba to an
hypnoptic state, while Martin labeled it a psychic catharsis akin to
ecstaticism.62
These earlier estimates55-57 gradually gave way to more exacting
studies and
to the chagrin of many, the glossolalist was pronounced no more 'abnormal"
than the ordinary non-tongue speaking Christian.
Formal studies such as that recently completed by John P. Kildahl25
have substantiated
the fact that there is very little difference between the mental
health of active
churchgoers who speak in tongues and those who do not. This conclusion has been
supported by numerous other studies.16,40 Goodman regards the glossolalic
behavior as a state of dissociation while Wayne Oates51 speaks of
"psychological
communication." Both refuse to regard the behavior as
pathological. Generally,
at the moment, there is a reluctance to regard the "state" into which
a glossolabst goes when he speaks, however defined, as a pathological one.
Biblical Studies
The vast amount of scholarly research that has been done with reference to Acts
is slow to find its way into the discussions about glossolalia. The problem of
the sources used in the composition of Acts, for example, as well as the role
of the redactor, has received little attention except in one or two
recent works.
33,52 Traditionally, interpreters have regarded the "other
tongues' in Acts
2:4 as either a reference to foreign languages,3,18,43 to a miracle
of hearing,7,41
or to unintelligible speech.15 There is, of course, considerable
variation within
the groups, but few attempts to interpret tongues within the broader context of
Lukan theology.
The apparent ambivalence over glossolalia in Paul has allowed him to
be the champion
of both those who support58 and those who oppose1 tongues. Consequently, there
is little agreement among scholars regarding the interpretation of tongues in
I Corinthians. Some find the background of the phenomenon in Hellenism, noting
there numerous examples of ecstatieism.19,34 Others looks to a
Palestinian background.
This religionsgesehiete approach is fascinating but in such
discussions the meaning
of glossolalia often goes wanting.
The problem of the exact relationship between the tongues in Acts and
I Corinthians
is an area that needs careful attention. The majority of scholars concede that
Paul was not attacking tongues per se, but rather he was attempting
to give some
estimate of their relative value. His attitude appears to have been
reserved but
not altogether negative.68
Theological Studies
There have been several works that are critical of glossulalia from a
theological
perspective. 5,32 Anthony Hoekema points to basic inconsistencies that develop
if the validity of glossulalia as a spiritual experience is
maintained alongside
other doctrines of orthodoxy.20 The basic point where most studies of this
variety end is the biblical principle put forth by Paul: "Does glossolalia
help build up the community?" (I Cor. 14:5). Again, this only attests to
the need for a definitive evaluation of the biblical evidence.
Positive theological evaluations arise mainly from within the
Pentecostal tradition.
These studies include works by Larry Christenson,6 a Lutheran pastor, and
W.H. Turner.45 Although writing from outside of Pentecostal ranks,
John Kildahl25
and Watson Mills33 give some theological overview. A symposium edited by Wade
Horton22 consists of seven articles by prominent Pentecostals'. It affords the
reader a good summary of glossolalia from varying perspectives within
Pentecostalism.
Testimonia
Within the Pentecostal publications the list of testimunia would be legion. The
reader is referred to the various periudicals99-105 where any number of case
histories are reported.
A popular book by John Sherrill42 written in journalistic style
recounts the reporter's
study of the phenomenon together with his own involvement in it. More detailed
and carefully drawn case studies are reported in Goodman,16 Kildahl,25
Samarin,40
and Vivier.97
Marcus Bach's work is readable and traces the quest for the
"inner ecstasy"
through the use of hallucinogenic drugs and various meditative
practices to glossolalia.2
Unpublished Materials
Lincoln M. Vivier's doctoral dissertation97 remains one of the must
significant
unpublished items for the study of glossolalia. It treats the biblical evidence
and the occurellees of tonguespeech within Christian history. Also, it includes
the results of a survey he conducted in which he concludes that glossolalists
are somewhat below average in their psychological adjustment.
There are numerous other reports, papers and theses on the subject. Lists may
be found in Martin.31
The literally thousands of privately printed tracts and pamphlets prevent any
bibliography on glossolalia from being definitive. Perhaps the best collection
of these may be found at the Oral Roberts University, though it is by no means
complete.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
1Anderson, Sir Robert. Spirit Manifestation and the Gift of Tongues. Neptune:
New Jersey: Loizeaux Brothers, nd.
2Bach, Marcus, The Inner Ecstasy. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1909.
3Barnett, Maurice. The Living Flame. London: Epwarth Press, 1953.
4Bloch-Hoell, Nils. The Pentecostal Movement: Its Origin,
Development, and Distinctive
Character. London: Allen and Unwin, 1964.
5Burdick, Donald W, Tongues: To Speak or Not to Speak! Chicago: Moody
Press, 1969.
6Christenson, Laurence. Speaking in Tongues and the Significance far
the Church.
Minneapolis: Bethany Fellowship Publishers, 1968.
7Cutten, George B. Speaking with Tongues: Historically and
Psychologically Considered.
New York: Yale University Press, 1927.
8Daltan, Robert C. Tongues Like as of Fire. Springfield, Missouri:
Gospel Publishing
House, 1945.
9Ewart, Frank J. The Phenomenon of Pentecost: A History of the Latter Rain. St.
Louis: Pentecostal Publishing House, 1947.
10Ford, J. M. The Pentecostal Experience: A New Direction for
American Catholics.
New York: Paulist Press, 1970.
11Frodshani, Stanley H. With Signs Following: The Story of the
Pentecostal Revival
in the Twentieth Century. Revised edition. Springfield, Missouri:
Gospel Publishing
House, 1946.
12Gee, Donald. Concerning Spiritual Gifts, Springfield, Missouri:
Gospel Publishing
House, 1947.WATSON E. MILLS
13_________________________The Pentecostal Movement, Including the Story
of the War Years, 1940-47, London: Elim Publishing
Company, 1949.
l4Gelpi, Donald L, Pentecostalism: A Theological Viewpoint. New York: Paulist
Press, 1971.
l5Gognel, Maurice, The Birth of Christianity. Translated by H.
C. Snape. New York: Macmillan and Company, 1954.
16Goodman, Felicitas D. Speaking in Tongues: A Cross Cultural
Study of Glossolalia. Chicago: The University of Chicago
Press, 1972.
l7Guillaume, Alfred. Prophecy and Divination Among the Hebrews and Other
Semites. London: Hodder and Stoughton,
1938.
18Hayes, Dnremus Almy. The Gifts of Tongues. Cincinnati:
Jennings and Graham, 1913.
19Hering, Jean. The First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians.
Translated by A. W. Heathcote and P. G. Allcock, London: Epworth Press, 1962.
20Hoekema, Anthony A. What About Tongue-Speaking? Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1966.
21Hullenweger, Walter J. The Pentecostals: The Charismatic
Movement in the Churches. Translated by R. A. Wilson.
Minneapolis: Angsburg Publishing House, 1972.
22Hnrton, Wade H. (ed.). The Glosrololia Phenomenon. Cleveland, Tennessee: Pathway Press, 1966.
23Kesey, Morton T. Tongue-Speaking: An Experiment in Spiritual Experience. New York: Doubleday and Company,
1964.
24Knox, Ronad A. Enthusiasm: A Chapter in the History of Religion.
New York: Oxford
University Press, 1950.
25Kildahl, John P. The Psychology of Speaking in Tongues, New
York: Harper and Row, 1972.
26Lanternari, Vittorin. The Reigiuns of the Oppressed: A Study of
Modern Cities.
New York: A. A. Knupf, 1965.
27Lewis, I. M. Ecstatic Religion. Baltimore: Penguin Banks,
1971.
28Losnbard, Emile, De la Glossolalie chez les premiers chretiens et
des pheuosnenes similaires. Lausanne: G. Bridel, 1910.
29Mackie, Alexander. The Gift of Tongues. New York: George
H. Doran Company, 1921.
30Martin, Ira Jay. Glossolalia in the Apostolic Church: A Study
of Tongue-Speech. Berea, Kentucky: Berea College Press,
1960.
31_______________ Glossolalia, the Gift of Tongues-A Bibliography. Cleveland, Tennessee: Pathway
Press, 1970.
32Metz, Donald. Speaking in Tongues: An Analysis. Kansas City,
Missouri: Nazarene Publishing Company, 1964.
33Mills, Watson E. Understanding Speaking in Tongues. Grand
Rapids: Eerdosans Publishing Company, 1972.
34Moffatt, James. The First Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians. New
York: Harper
and Brothers, 1938.
35Mosimano, Eddisoo. Dos Zungenredeu geschichtlich nod psychologisch
uurersucht. Tubingeo: J. C. B. Mohr, 1911.
36Nichol, John T. Pentecostalism. New York: Harper and Row,
1966.
370'Connor, Edward D. The Pentecostal Movement. Notre
Dame: ,Ave Maria Press, 1971.
38Ranaghan, Dorothy and Kevin (eds.). As the Spirit Leads Us. Parmus,
New Jersey: Paulist-Newman Press, 1971.
39________________
Catholic Pentecostals. Parmus, New Jersey: Paulist-Newman Press, 1969.
40Samarin, William J, Tongues of Men and Angels: The Religious Language of
Pentecostalisms. New York: Macmillan
and Company, 1972.
4lScott, F. F. The Spirit in the New Testament. New York:
George H. Doran Company, 1923.
42Sherrill, John. They Speak with Other Tongues. New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964.
43Smith, Miles W. On Whosn the Spirit Came. Philadelphia: The
Jndson Press, 1948.
44Synan, Vinson. The Pentecostal-Holiness Movement. Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1971.
45Turner, W. H. Pentecost and Tongues. Shanghai: Modern Publishing
House, nd.
46Weinel, Heinrich. Die Wirkungen des Geistes und Geister insnachapostolischen Zeitalter his auf
Irenasss. Leipzig: J. C.
B. Mohr, 1899.
Essays
47Bourguinoo, Erika. "World Distribution and Patterns of Possession States," in Trance and Possession States, Raymond Prince, editor,
Montreal: B. M. Bucke Memorial Society, 1968, Pp. 3-34.
48Faupel, David W. "The American Pentecostal Movement: A Bibliographical
Essay." Wilmore, Kentucky: Asbury Theological Seminary, 1972.
49Hinson, E. Glenn. "A Brief History of Glossolalia," in Frank
Stagg, et al, Glossolalia: Tongue Speaking in Biblical, Historical, and Psychological Perspective. Nashville: Abingdon
Press, 1967. Pp. 45-75.
50Mills, Watson E. Speaking in Tongues: Classified Bibliography. Franklin Springs, Georgia: Society for Pentecostal
Studies, 1974.
51Oates, Wayne E. "A Sucio-Psychological Study of Glossolalia,"
in Frank Stagg, et al, Glossololio: Tongue Speaking in
Biblical, Historical, and Psychological Perspective. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1967, Pp. 76-99.
52Stagg, Frank. "Glossolalia in the New Testament," in Frank
Stagg, et al, Glossolalia: Tongue Speaking in Biblical, Historical, and Psychological Perspective. Nashville: Abingdon Press,
1967. Pp. 20-44.
Articles
53Boisen, A. T. "Religion and Hard Times: A Study of the Holy
Rollers,"
Social Action, V (March 15, 1939), 8-35.
54Currie, Stuart D. "Speaking in Tongues: Early Evidence Outside the New Testament Bearing on
'Glossais Lalein,'
Interpretation, XIX (1965), 274-294.
55Lapslvy, James N. and John H. Simpson. "Speaking in
Tongues: Infantile Babble or Song of the Self?" Pastoral
Psychology, XV (September, 1964), 16-24.
56_______________________________.
"Speaking in Tongues: Token of Group Acceptance and Divine Approval," Pastoral Psychology, XV
(May, 1964), 48-55.
57___________________________.
"Speaking in Tongues," Princeton Seminary Bulletin, LVII (February, 1.965), 1-18.
58MaeDonald, William G. "Glossolalia in the New Testament,"
Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society, VII,
(Spring, 1964), 59-68.
59McDonnell, Kilian. "Catholic Charismaties," Commonweal,
IVC (May 5, 1972), 207-211.
60________________ "Catholic Pentecostalism:
Problems in Evaluation,"
Dialog, IX (Winter, 1970), 35-54.
61________________ "Pentecostals and the Holy
Spirit Today,"
Sisters Today, XXXX (May, 1969), 497-506.
62Martin, Ira Jay. "Glossolaha in the Apostolic Church," Journal of Biblical Literature, LXIII (1944), 123-130.
63May, L. Carlyle. "A Survey of Glossolalia and Related Phenomena in Non-Christian Religions," American Anthropologist, LVIII (February, 1956), 75-96.
64Mills, Watson F. "Glossolalia: Christianity's 'Counterculture' Amidst a
Silent Majority," Christian Century, LXXXIX (September 27,
1972), 949-951.
65 ______________ "Reassessing Glossolalia," Christian Century,
LXXXVII (October 14, 1970), 1217- 1219.
66Newport, John P. "Speaking in Tongues," Home Missions
XXXVI (May, 1965), 7-9, 21-26.
67Pike, James A. "Pastoral Letter Regarding 'Speaking in Tongues,'"
Pastoral Psychology, XV (May, 1964), 56-61.
68Sweet, J. P. N. "A Sign for Unbelievers: Paul's Attitude to
Glossolalia,"
New Testament Studies, XIII (April, 1967), 240-257.
69Van Elderen, Bastiaan, "Glossolalia in the New Testament,"
Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society, VII
(Spring, 1964), 53-58.
70Woodside, Edmund B. "Glossolalia, the Gift of Tongues: A
Bibliography,"
Fuller Library Bulletin, Number 11 (JulySeptember, 1951), 3-5.
71Wright. Arthur. "The Gift of Tongues: A New View," Theological Monthly, V (1891), 161-169, 272-180.
Lexicons, Dictionaries, Encyclopaedias
72Abbott Smith, C. A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testa
went. Third edition. London: T. & T. Clark, 1937. P. 93.
73Andrews, Elias. "Ecstasy," The Interpreter's Dictionary of the
Bible. 4 volumes. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962. A-D, 21-22.
74___________________"Spiritual Gifts," The Interpreter's Dictionary
of the Bible. 4 volumes. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962. R-Z, 435-437.
75___________________ "Tongues, Gift of," The Interpreter's
Dictionary of the Bible. 4 volumes. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1962. B-F, 671-672.
76Baner, Walter. A Creek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early
Christina Literature. Fourth revised edition. Translated by William
F, Arndt and
F. Wilbur Gingrich. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952. Pp.
161-162.
77Behm, Johannes. "Glossa," Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament. Translated by Geoffrey W. Bromiley. 9 volumes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 19641974. 1, 719-727.
78Clark, Elmer T. "Modern Speaking with Tongues," Twentieth
Century Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. L. A. Loetscher, editor.
2 volumes.
Grand Rapids: Eerdmaos Publishing Company, 1955, II, 1118.
79Clemcns, J. S. "Pentecost," A Dictionary of the Apostolic Church.
James Hastings, editor. 2 volumes. New York: Scribner's Sons, II, 160-164.
80Easton, Burton Scott. "Tongues, Gift of," The
International Standard
Bible Encyclopedia. 5 volumes. Chicago: The Howard-Severance Company, 1915. V,
2995-2997.
8lFeine, Paul. "Speaking with Tongues," The New Schaff-Herzag Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. 5, M. Jackson, editor. 15
volumes. Grand
Rapids: Baker Book House, 1950. XI, 36-39.
82Harvey, Van A. "Glossolalia," A Handbook of Theological Terms. New
York: Macmillan and Company, 1964. Pp. 104-105.
83Johoston, George. "Spirit," A Theological Word Book of the Bible.
Alan Richardson, editor. New York: MacMillan and Company, 1952. Pp.
233-247.
84Keilbach, W. "Zungenreden," Die Religion in Geschichte
ussd Gegeoscart.
Kurt Galling, editor. 6 vols. Tubissgen: J. C. B, Mohr, 1962. VI,
1941-1942.
85Liddell, George H. and Robert Scott. A Greek-English Lexicon of New Testament
Greek. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1895. P. 312.
86Pope, R, Martin. "Gift of Tongues," A Dictionary of the Apostolic
Church. James Hastings, editor. 2 volumes. New York: Scribner's Sons, 1908. II,
598.599.
87Thayer, Joseph Henry. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament.
Edinburgh:
T, & T. Clark, 1901. Pp' 118-119.
88Tongues, Gift of," Encyclopedia Britannica, 23 volumes.
Chicago: William
Benton, 1962. XXII, 288-289.
Magazines
89Bess, Donovan. "Speaking in Tongues-the High Church
Heresy," The Nation,
CXCVII (September 28, 1963), 173-177.
90Carter, Richard. "That Old-Time Religion Comes Back,"
Coronet (February,
1958), pp. 125130.
91Phillips, McCandlish. "And There Appeared to Them Tongues of Fire,"
The Saturday Evening Post (May 16, 1964), pp. 31-33, 39-40.
92"Speaking in Tongues," Time, LXXVI (August 15, 1960), 53,
55.
Unpublished Materials
93Gerlach, L. P. and V. H. Hine. "The Charismatic Revival:
Process and Recruitment,
Conversion, and Behavioral Change in Modern Religious Movement."
Unpublished
paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1966.
94"Preliminary Report." .A report of the Division of
Pastoral Services
of the Episcopal Diocese of California, Study Commission on
Glossolalia, 1963.
95"Report on Glossolalia." .A report of the Commission on Evangelism
of the American Lutheran Church, Minneapolis, 1962.
96"Report of the Special Study Committee on the Work of the Holy
Spirit."
A report of the United Presbyterian Church of the U.S.A.,
Philadelphia, 1970.
97Vivier, Lincoln Morse Van Eetveldt. "Glossolalia."
Unpublished Doctor's
dissertation, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South
Africa, 1960.
98WcIliver, Kenneth Bruce. "Pentecost and the Early
Church," Unpublished
doctor's dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, 1961.
Glossolalia-Orientated Periodicals
99Acts: Today's News of the Holy Spirit's Renewal. Los Angeles: Acts
Publishers,
1967ff.
1005Charisrna Digest. Los Angeles: Full Gospel Business Men's
Fellowship International,
1953ff.
101Fnll Gospel Business Men's Voice. Los Angeles: Full Gospel
Business Men's Fellowship
International, 1953ff.
102Logos: An International Charismatic Journal. Plainfield, New Jersey: Logos
International, 1932ff.
103Paraclete: A Journal Concerning the Person and Work of the
Holy Spirit. Springfield, Missouri: Assemblies of God, 1967ff.
104Trinity. Van Nnys, California: Blessed Trinity Society, 1962-1966.
105Viesc: A Quarterly Journal Interpreting the World-Wide Charismatic Renewal.
Los Angeles: Full Gospel Business Men's Fellowship International,
1966-1968.
Church Fathers
106Apollinaris, quoted in Euscbius, Church History, V, xvi.
107Augustine, On Baptism, Against the Donatists, III, xvi, 21.
108 ________________The City of God, XVIII, 49.
109 _______________.
Homily on the First Epistle of John, VI, x.
110Chrysostom, Homily, XXIX, XXXII, XXXV.
111Gregory of Narianzen, Oration XLI, "On Pentecost."
112Irenaieus, Against Heresies, I, xiii, 3; III, xii, 1; V, vi, 1.
113Origen, Against Celsus, VII, ix.
114Tertullian, Against Marcion, V viii.